Greetings good citizen, given the cesspool modern society IS, WHO would take it into their head to make a career out of keeping the public abreast of the latest scandal?
Regardless of what the 'raw story' is, no reporter is 'free' to report what they know. The 'talking head' is precisely that, an physically attractive individual with reasonably good diction and enunciation that reads whatever is put in front of them with a degree of 'gravitas'. [Even if they are mentally picturing the pope naked to prevent them from guffawing over the ridiculousness of the text in front of them.]
Again, this is for those who get lost in thought because they don't go there very often. We once again go screaming off the reservation to observe the source of the lies that make up the world we wake up to everyday.
The above is precisely the, er, description of the 'readers' who are in fact ACTORS plying their craft.
[Just because they call themselves 'journalists' doesn't make it true.]
Like Don Henley's song says, "I just have to look good, I don't have to be clear." News people don't go into details because all they know is what's on the paper/prompter in front of them.
Wait, what about the news you buy? The people in the print media have more control/knowledge of the story they are reporting on, right?
Se habla EDITOR?
NOTHING a reporter writes get to press without first being 'cleared' by an editor.
Like a 'judge' in a courtroom, the editor's primary function isn't grammar but the level of controversy/liability the paper would face for revealing a shitshow that has been going on since the beginning of civilization.
Criminality isn't the problem here. Causing a riot that resulted in the lynchings of powerful wealthy people is what they are...charged with avoiding.
[Not that the wealthy criminals don't need lynching it's that the criminals are vengeful and have people who go around murdering people that displease them...and news people are at the top of the list of people that tend to get killed.]
Remember: ONLY rogues and scoundrels require the 'cloak of secrecy'...like when the government invokes 'national security' to cover up what they don't want the public to find out about.
Take today's headlines about the incumbent's former attorney confessing to lying to Congress...what do you suppose is going to come out of that?
We already know the 'pathological liar' will deny there was any involvement we also know, like El Rushbo you can't believe a single word he says. He is the proverbial 'Boy who cried Wolf', he lies with such frequency that he can contradict himself in the same sentence.
So when the 'media' reports we are a 'divided society' we have to wonder what the hell they are talking about? EVERY news item involving REPUBLICANS is about corruption or criminality...causing the public to be united in their opinion that the Justice system [for profit or otherwise] is worthless and that the government is run by CRIMINALS.
This is no longer up for debate. It is universally agreed that those elected to any public office take their marching orders from the criminal elements of society.
Where does today's 'tightrope' enter the discussion? [I once again needn't draw pictures for the erudite.] With just about every 'news item' being related to corrupt government officials or government agencies pursuing objectives that nobody (directly) told them to pursue...most of which is traced back to 'political appointees' with zero 'expertise' in the divisions they have been named the head of.
It is also this same media that demonizes the (fake) political opposition leaving the clueless electorate to vote for the only remaining option, the criminals!
So, anyone else think we have an 'information problem' on our hands?
It's actually a crisis but most of you remain (blissfully) unaware of the scope and breadth of the situation.
How sad that ignorance is no longer an option?
Act or be acted upon.
But you need not listen to me, what do I know?
Thanks for letting me inside your head,
Gegner
Regardless of what the 'raw story' is, no reporter is 'free' to report what they know. The 'talking head' is precisely that, an physically attractive individual with reasonably good diction and enunciation that reads whatever is put in front of them with a degree of 'gravitas'. [Even if they are mentally picturing the pope naked to prevent them from guffawing over the ridiculousness of the text in front of them.]
Again, this is for those who get lost in thought because they don't go there very often. We once again go screaming off the reservation to observe the source of the lies that make up the world we wake up to everyday.
The above is precisely the, er, description of the 'readers' who are in fact ACTORS plying their craft.
[Just because they call themselves 'journalists' doesn't make it true.]
Like Don Henley's song says, "I just have to look good, I don't have to be clear." News people don't go into details because all they know is what's on the paper/prompter in front of them.
Wait, what about the news you buy? The people in the print media have more control/knowledge of the story they are reporting on, right?
Se habla EDITOR?
NOTHING a reporter writes get to press without first being 'cleared' by an editor.
Like a 'judge' in a courtroom, the editor's primary function isn't grammar but the level of controversy/liability the paper would face for revealing a shitshow that has been going on since the beginning of civilization.
Criminality isn't the problem here. Causing a riot that resulted in the lynchings of powerful wealthy people is what they are...charged with avoiding.
[Not that the wealthy criminals don't need lynching it's that the criminals are vengeful and have people who go around murdering people that displease them...and news people are at the top of the list of people that tend to get killed.]
Remember: ONLY rogues and scoundrels require the 'cloak of secrecy'...like when the government invokes 'national security' to cover up what they don't want the public to find out about.
Take today's headlines about the incumbent's former attorney confessing to lying to Congress...what do you suppose is going to come out of that?
We already know the 'pathological liar' will deny there was any involvement we also know, like El Rushbo you can't believe a single word he says. He is the proverbial 'Boy who cried Wolf', he lies with such frequency that he can contradict himself in the same sentence.
So when the 'media' reports we are a 'divided society' we have to wonder what the hell they are talking about? EVERY news item involving REPUBLICANS is about corruption or criminality...causing the public to be united in their opinion that the Justice system [for profit or otherwise] is worthless and that the government is run by CRIMINALS.
This is no longer up for debate. It is universally agreed that those elected to any public office take their marching orders from the criminal elements of society.
Where does today's 'tightrope' enter the discussion? [I once again needn't draw pictures for the erudite.] With just about every 'news item' being related to corrupt government officials or government agencies pursuing objectives that nobody (directly) told them to pursue...most of which is traced back to 'political appointees' with zero 'expertise' in the divisions they have been named the head of.
It is also this same media that demonizes the (fake) political opposition leaving the clueless electorate to vote for the only remaining option, the criminals!
So, anyone else think we have an 'information problem' on our hands?
It's actually a crisis but most of you remain (blissfully) unaware of the scope and breadth of the situation.
How sad that ignorance is no longer an option?
Act or be acted upon.
But you need not listen to me, what do I know?
Thanks for letting me inside your head,
Gegner
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you can't stay on topic then don't say anything...