Greetings good citizen, every once in a while, usually in the midst of committing (yet another) atrocity, some brave soul would get off their dead posterior and wack the perp on the noggin with a boulder, killing them mid crime.
Back before we had courts and criminal rights the brave/foolish citizen would be feted for his courage and rewarded with some token of the tribe's appreciation.
Why bring this up?
Did I mention criminals set up what passes for the existing Justice system? Dunno what 'die hard' Trump supporters think but a goodly percentage of the country is more than somewhat concerned that King Donald gave the justice department a rigid middle finger when he pardoned Sheriff Arpaio.
People were HOPING for change when they voted for Candidate Pussygrabber but I suspect this isn't even remotely what they were hoping for...[but we remain ignorant to this day how, precisely either Reagan or Bush the Lesser got second terms.]
Yup, 'Morning in America' was a watershed moment in US history, it will be the reference point researchers will return to when seeking answers to how it all went so horribly wrong.
While the founders are already leaning heavily on their fall back defense [It was our first time, we didn't have anything to go by!] Which is a load of malarky because you don't have to scratch the surface of the new model too hard or deep to find the ancient slavers frame 'prettied up' with a coat of faux public participation and the stalwart chihuahua of Men, both good and true to defend their foundling creation.
Makes you wonder which one of them planned on holding the lantern?
Naturally, we know now that this 'new nation' was founded by criminals and the proviso 'men both good and true' referred to THEM!
Zero irony that just about all of the founders got taken in by land swindles of one type or another. {Naturally, it was their 'first time'...}
So now we have a 'chief executive' who grew up believing he was 'above the law' in charge of those appointed to uphold it.
Understand that if the 'system' weren't broken beyond belief [The bankrupt media 'produces' the election cycle.] We wouldn't be saddled wih the clueless managing our nation because he 'polled well' with the [psycho] focus groups!
Seems the 'principle qualification' for running this nation isn't your executive credentials but 'name recognition'.
Knowing what a cesspit commerce is, people innately distrust 'businessmen' in politics [mostly because governments are founded SPECIFICALLY to protect the public from crooked businessmen!]
So the 'near famous' Captians of Industry have usually refrained from making a bid to head up what most of them refer to as 'the bane of their existence.'
Then there's this guy. Who didn't 'abandon' anything. [Usually upon winning the presidency, the 'president elect' will divest themselves of their business interests to avoid any appearance of 'impropriety'.
While other have attacked him for 'interferring' with his 'former' business interests, he has 'divested'...(he just hasn't left.)
Skipping back to the title, where does all this leave YOU (and more importantly YOUR CHILDREN!)
If the laws are BY THEM, FOR US. This leaves us at a decided disadvantage, something that happens once a planet runs out of 'running room'.
Ever wonder why you can find bands of humanity even in the harshest environments this planet has to offer?
You don't, do you...because it is perfectly understandable, stupid, but understandable. It is a riff off of that old saying, "better to rule in hell than to serve in Heaven."
Scientists speculate we [humans] don't possess the 'processing power' to appreciate the ramifications of overpopulation, never mind electing someone then giving them the authority to use nuclear weapons.
The few who have at least one working synapse were rather vocal about that very issue during the sham election but the the media, too focused on ratings, didn't listen...and neither did the bulk of the voting public.
[Understand, Trump LOST...but the media and their owners didn't care...just as Bush the lesser LOST but again, that didn't affect the outcome.]
So before you sit here believing 'all is lost, I live in Stupidville' take heart, those with working brains are still in the majority...in fact the smarter ones don't vote and haven't for a long time, waiting for precisely this moment.
Yes, 'hi-jack' situations like the one you suddenly found yourself living in happen all the time under the now ancient 'Slaver Model'. {And the Slaver model will remain with us until those who support it are purged from our society.)
Who supports it? Re-read my posts, the answer is there.
Not a mystery though...why did El Trumpo pardon who he pardoned?
Two and two still makes 4 although I doubt the averge conservative can figure that out without a calculator.
How long will you wrap yourself in the flag before you realize it's made of used toilet paper?
A lot to process, let's leave this one here while you get to it.
Thanks head, I appreciate your patience.
Gegner
Back before we had courts and criminal rights the brave/foolish citizen would be feted for his courage and rewarded with some token of the tribe's appreciation.
Why bring this up?
Did I mention criminals set up what passes for the existing Justice system? Dunno what 'die hard' Trump supporters think but a goodly percentage of the country is more than somewhat concerned that King Donald gave the justice department a rigid middle finger when he pardoned Sheriff Arpaio.
People were HOPING for change when they voted for Candidate Pussygrabber but I suspect this isn't even remotely what they were hoping for...[but we remain ignorant to this day how, precisely either Reagan or Bush the Lesser got second terms.]
Yup, 'Morning in America' was a watershed moment in US history, it will be the reference point researchers will return to when seeking answers to how it all went so horribly wrong.
While the founders are already leaning heavily on their fall back defense [It was our first time, we didn't have anything to go by!] Which is a load of malarky because you don't have to scratch the surface of the new model too hard or deep to find the ancient slavers frame 'prettied up' with a coat of faux public participation and the stalwart chihuahua of Men, both good and true to defend their foundling creation.
Makes you wonder which one of them planned on holding the lantern?
Naturally, we know now that this 'new nation' was founded by criminals and the proviso 'men both good and true' referred to THEM!
Zero irony that just about all of the founders got taken in by land swindles of one type or another. {Naturally, it was their 'first time'...}
So now we have a 'chief executive' who grew up believing he was 'above the law' in charge of those appointed to uphold it.
Understand that if the 'system' weren't broken beyond belief [The bankrupt media 'produces' the election cycle.] We wouldn't be saddled wih the clueless managing our nation because he 'polled well' with the [psycho] focus groups!
Seems the 'principle qualification' for running this nation isn't your executive credentials but 'name recognition'.
Knowing what a cesspit commerce is, people innately distrust 'businessmen' in politics [mostly because governments are founded SPECIFICALLY to protect the public from crooked businessmen!]
So the 'near famous' Captians of Industry have usually refrained from making a bid to head up what most of them refer to as 'the bane of their existence.'
Then there's this guy. Who didn't 'abandon' anything. [Usually upon winning the presidency, the 'president elect' will divest themselves of their business interests to avoid any appearance of 'impropriety'.
While other have attacked him for 'interferring' with his 'former' business interests, he has 'divested'...(he just hasn't left.)
Skipping back to the title, where does all this leave YOU (and more importantly YOUR CHILDREN!)
If the laws are BY THEM, FOR US. This leaves us at a decided disadvantage, something that happens once a planet runs out of 'running room'.
Ever wonder why you can find bands of humanity even in the harshest environments this planet has to offer?
You don't, do you...because it is perfectly understandable, stupid, but understandable. It is a riff off of that old saying, "better to rule in hell than to serve in Heaven."
Scientists speculate we [humans] don't possess the 'processing power' to appreciate the ramifications of overpopulation, never mind electing someone then giving them the authority to use nuclear weapons.
The few who have at least one working synapse were rather vocal about that very issue during the sham election but the the media, too focused on ratings, didn't listen...and neither did the bulk of the voting public.
[Understand, Trump LOST...but the media and their owners didn't care...just as Bush the lesser LOST but again, that didn't affect the outcome.]
So before you sit here believing 'all is lost, I live in Stupidville' take heart, those with working brains are still in the majority...in fact the smarter ones don't vote and haven't for a long time, waiting for precisely this moment.
Yes, 'hi-jack' situations like the one you suddenly found yourself living in happen all the time under the now ancient 'Slaver Model'. {And the Slaver model will remain with us until those who support it are purged from our society.)
Who supports it? Re-read my posts, the answer is there.
Not a mystery though...why did El Trumpo pardon who he pardoned?
Two and two still makes 4 although I doubt the averge conservative can figure that out without a calculator.
How long will you wrap yourself in the flag before you realize it's made of used toilet paper?
A lot to process, let's leave this one here while you get to it.
Thanks head, I appreciate your patience.
Gegner
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you can't stay on topic then don't say anything...