Greetings good citizen, like many things in our 'go along to get along' civilization we have long suffered from 'interpretive differences' that have led to full time legislators as the legal 'hairs' are split ever finer...until nobody remembers why we are there or even how it got to be this way?
What fresh hell is this? Not fresh and it certainly isn't new. It's been with us since the very first idea was shared, the dreamer said one thing and half of the people there heard something else.
We writers often lament the condition commonly known as the 'imprecision of speech' but it's what keeps attorneys in the chips because they claim 'expertise' above all others [when that fails they have a judge that will back them up...sort of.] (In case you wonder where the phrase 'I'll lie and you swear to it' came from.)
So it is with the 'social contract'. Not only do the general conditions of the social contract get quibbled over but if you want to challenge the current, Mercurial, position you'd best have deep pockets and darn good lawyers.
Because once you start to parse the situation (as you see it) it will change and you will be obliged to start again.
We end up with all parties involved using 'their understanding' of the law in the defense of their actions.
So in the end the most you will agree on is it was just one big misunderstanding and nobody was 'wrong', simply mistaken.
Think I'm done? Think again.
You should be on high alert right now because this is an extremely perilous situation [let me direct your attention to the refusal of prosecutors to file charges against officers that, for whatever the reason, use lethal force to defend their lives during the performance of their duties.]
Not only do these, er, operatives misunderstand their role in preserving the social contract [the contract exists specifically to AVENGE you!]
If the prosecutor refuses to even investigate there isn't a chance in hell you're going to be avenged.
This is the 'presumption of guilt' that keeps the officer's hand on his weapon from the moment he approaches you...this is BAD.
[Understand, badge or no badge you are legally permitted to act in the face of lethal intent. If a cop approaches you and his hand is on his weapon, you are legally in the right to do whatever is necessary to defend your life. That's what the 'social contract' says. The badge gives Bobo no special privileges, the whole uniform thing is made up. It is intended to frighten you into submission.]
While I am 'fixing ignorance' and exposing BS let us examine the origins of the 'peace officer'.
Tyrants did pretty much as they damn well pleased because of 'force majeure', you object and the palace guard [the original 'uniformed thug'] would kill you.
There is zero difference between the uniformed thug of old and today's badge brandishing bully.
It might be interesting to note that the social contract makes zero provision for 'armed thugs'. They appeared at the behest of those who were willing to pay them.
While they [and the prosecutors above them] 'pretend' to work for the public, they really work for the 'organization'. The thieves that prey on you and your misery. [Our so-called 'betters'.]
Why did the kings, masters of all they surveyed, step off of the throne only to barricade themselves in the Treasury?
It was these same people that, er, caused to be formed a force to enforce the laws of the land [not really the social contract because there were a ton of 'whereas' in there (meaning 'because this says so')
How the thieves must have laughed! Let the people pretend to elect their own leaders, when things go wrong we will have the media blame the party and no one will know it is the same as it ever was all along!
Humanity has a long wicked history of 'getting over' on the trusting. It has gotten to the point that most of you believe if people aren't smart enough to realize they are being taken then they deserve it.
Yet you bring your kids into this world...
What kind of monster are you?
Luckily, this can all change on a dime.
If the social contract isn't worth anything then neither is the glue that holds society together [thus the rampages the kids are protesting while the royal wannabes push for a weapons ban.]
Stop the money and we stop them, it really is that simple.
Thanks for stopping by and opening your mind,
Gegner
What fresh hell is this? Not fresh and it certainly isn't new. It's been with us since the very first idea was shared, the dreamer said one thing and half of the people there heard something else.
We writers often lament the condition commonly known as the 'imprecision of speech' but it's what keeps attorneys in the chips because they claim 'expertise' above all others [when that fails they have a judge that will back them up...sort of.] (In case you wonder where the phrase 'I'll lie and you swear to it' came from.)
So it is with the 'social contract'. Not only do the general conditions of the social contract get quibbled over but if you want to challenge the current, Mercurial, position you'd best have deep pockets and darn good lawyers.
Because once you start to parse the situation (as you see it) it will change and you will be obliged to start again.
We end up with all parties involved using 'their understanding' of the law in the defense of their actions.
So in the end the most you will agree on is it was just one big misunderstanding and nobody was 'wrong', simply mistaken.
Think I'm done? Think again.
You should be on high alert right now because this is an extremely perilous situation [let me direct your attention to the refusal of prosecutors to file charges against officers that, for whatever the reason, use lethal force to defend their lives during the performance of their duties.]
Not only do these, er, operatives misunderstand their role in preserving the social contract [the contract exists specifically to AVENGE you!]
If the prosecutor refuses to even investigate there isn't a chance in hell you're going to be avenged.
This is the 'presumption of guilt' that keeps the officer's hand on his weapon from the moment he approaches you...this is BAD.
[Understand, badge or no badge you are legally permitted to act in the face of lethal intent. If a cop approaches you and his hand is on his weapon, you are legally in the right to do whatever is necessary to defend your life. That's what the 'social contract' says. The badge gives Bobo no special privileges, the whole uniform thing is made up. It is intended to frighten you into submission.]
While I am 'fixing ignorance' and exposing BS let us examine the origins of the 'peace officer'.
Tyrants did pretty much as they damn well pleased because of 'force majeure', you object and the palace guard [the original 'uniformed thug'] would kill you.
There is zero difference between the uniformed thug of old and today's badge brandishing bully.
It might be interesting to note that the social contract makes zero provision for 'armed thugs'. They appeared at the behest of those who were willing to pay them.
While they [and the prosecutors above them] 'pretend' to work for the public, they really work for the 'organization'. The thieves that prey on you and your misery. [Our so-called 'betters'.]
Why did the kings, masters of all they surveyed, step off of the throne only to barricade themselves in the Treasury?
It was these same people that, er, caused to be formed a force to enforce the laws of the land [not really the social contract because there were a ton of 'whereas' in there (meaning 'because this says so')
How the thieves must have laughed! Let the people pretend to elect their own leaders, when things go wrong we will have the media blame the party and no one will know it is the same as it ever was all along!
Humanity has a long wicked history of 'getting over' on the trusting. It has gotten to the point that most of you believe if people aren't smart enough to realize they are being taken then they deserve it.
Yet you bring your kids into this world...
What kind of monster are you?
Luckily, this can all change on a dime.
If the social contract isn't worth anything then neither is the glue that holds society together [thus the rampages the kids are protesting while the royal wannabes push for a weapons ban.]
Stop the money and we stop them, it really is that simple.
Thanks for stopping by and opening your mind,
Gegner
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you can't stay on topic then don't say anything...