Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Pronouns

Greetings good citizen, 'we' apparently doesn't include everybody just as 'us' is usually reserved for present company.

Since no reporter is permitted to speak for the public as a whole, journalists train themselves not to use general pronouns.

So when conveying a story they keep it specific (unless it's a hatchet job, then the writer doesn't care who ends up under the bus because the 'truth' is usually the first victim sacrificed when crucifying entire groups, like Black people or that scourge of modern society, 'liberals'.

[How many of you are concerned that the same people who made the N-word taboo (by calling everybody and everything THEY DIDN'T APPROVE OF a 'nigger') have made the L-word even more so? [Liberal not lesbian, dummy!]

For an industry that takes pride in its 'objectiveness' they sure throw a lot of groups/brands under the bus and tar 'em with the broadest brush they can find...[which is to say 'fair and balanced' my ass!']

How many of you breathed a sigh of relief now that the Russians are filling the void left behind by the US military?

Who thinks the dimwit-in-chief knows what he is doing? [All numbnuts knows is he does what he's told or he ends up face down in a puddle of his own blood.]

How many of you smiled when you read that the Canadians are headed down the same media induced coma that the rest of the mindless world suffers from? Did you mutter 'at last!' when you learned it and repress a smug grin now that the world was finally on the same page as the Uber-rich? [People suck...everybody but ME that is.]

So we finally arrive at 'the point' of this post.

I never tell anyone what to think, that is why you have (whether us use it or not) a 'mind of your own'. That said I will bluntly tell you that the almighty WE must abandon the 'world of I' [the space capitalism forces you to live in] and embrace the world of us, from which all good things are possible.

The capitalist wants you in the world of I, it is where you will sacrifice your own children for the 'illusion of getting ahead'.

The birth rate keeps sinking to new lows as the feckless keep the economic pressure on the destitute, forcing them to wait longer to start families.

THEY don't have any problem finding women willing to bear them children. Hell, most, er, 'catches' have entourages of females working their little hearts out to 'snare' themselves a rich one.

Not flattering to use a 'trapping' analogy but it fits better than it appears.

Yeah, if there is 'competition' in the mating game it is over finding the 'best' mate.

Good for 'you' but horrible for the rest of us.

The 'barrier to breeding' has already risen beyond the six figure range. Considering that the typical wage earner makes less than $25,000 per year (and has for DECADES) where does this leave the majority of the procreation driven public?

Choosing not to breed, thank you very much! [Who said civic mindedness was dead? (hint: it was the feckless!)]

Understand, the whole planet isn't industrialized so the people of the 'third world' haven't received the don't breed memo...not yet anyway.

Humanity, if it wants to survive, must abandon the world of I and embrace wholeheartedly the world of WE!

Why am I saying this? Because the feckless few are ignoring this message and using their 'artificial' control of the marketplace to exclude their lessers from the future genepool.

Worse, as [fake] wealth continues to concentrate, the freakishly stupid will eliminate their only allies in the competition to be the last one standing.

Stupid begets stupid but you knew that.

Until next time, Head.

Gegner

If you don't abandon I and embrace we, nobody is going to make it into the future!





2 comments:

  1. Humanity, if it wants to survive, must abandon the world of I and embrace wholeheartedly the world of WE!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The 'barrier to breeding' has already risen beyond the six figure range. Considering that the typical wage earner makes less than $25,000 per year (and has for DECADES) where does this leave the majority of the procreation driven public?

    ReplyDelete

If you can't stay on topic then don't say anything...