Greetings good citizen, In order to be 'effective' members of society we need to be 'educated', and the education that begins at our parents knee, [teaching us how to speak and behave] pretty much summarizes the parent's role in the educational process. Turns out most people don't receive a 'detailed' education from their parents [mostly due to the parents themselves being woefully 'undereducated'] thus we are all required to attend 'school'...which is supposed to teach us about the world around us and our 'place' in it.
Today's headlines tell us [like the 'they came out of nowhere' tax cuts] that 'Republicans' [read campaign donors] are lining up behind 'school choice'.
[Like a dog whistle, 'school choice' harkens back to the now ancient public schools vs private school debate...imagine where you'd be if your parents had to pay for your education. For a vast majority of us school wouldn't even be an option, the rich aren't rich because they give it away! [Despite the 'it' in question being 'free' to the '*connected'.]
Why are the rich, 'rich'? {don't teach you this in school either!} Because they belong to the 'chain of bondage' that enslaves the non-rich! [Money is a chimera, you need it while they can have all they want so long as they force you to 'perform']
Understand, society [to them] isn't possible without slavery. How fucked up is that?
These are the same people conspiring to take away your kids right to an inadequate indoctrination, an 'education' with so many holes in it most will never figure out why they are perpetually on the wrong end of the stick...need a mirror?
Again it's not the money but the privilege that makes one a political mover and shaker [considering most politicians are 'rich' compared to the people that chose them...out of two possible choices because that's all you get, either libtard or conservo-whacko.
[Gegner has no truck with 'party politics' that have proven repeatedly they are self-serving!] What use is it to be a 'party member' when 'the opposition' controls BOTH Parties?
[Doesn't matter who you vote into office if they both take their marching orders from the same people.]
I'm sure I've lost some of you so to get back on the same page we need to rewind to the early debates regarding 'public education'. Back in the day only the wealthy [read *connected] could afford to provide their children with an 'education' beyond what they could learn at their parent's knee.
Humans being incurable mimics clamored to be 'educated' (which initially came out of the Church's archives of documented events...and was the strict domain of the priesthood.
Those who 'ruled' the land by military might were able to extract certain 'concessions' from those who ruled ignorance and their (male) children came to be included in the programs designed to indoctrinate young priests. [The Dark Ages proved just how 'dangerous' knowledge could be. It gave people 'ideas' when they were supposed to be focused on 'the glory of God'.]
But that's another debate.
Along came the Reformation and with it a general increase in knowledge. The 'awareness' of reading drove a thirst for knowledge among the ignorant and soon those who couldn't read or write found themselves the butt of crude jokes but the cruelest cut was they were also branded stupid and that was intolerable.
Naturally moving out from under the safety of the rocks meant we needed to learn how to live in larger 'communes' [the base root of communities.]
It soon became 'intolerable' to find oneself at an 'educational disadvantage' and the peasants made their displeasure known.
Our mimics taught one another (although thanks to inbred pigheadedness what you were taught was often incorrect.) [Like the assholes that cheaped out and let India take over the dictionary used for 'spellcheck' creating a considerable bastardization of American English because the differences between the Queen's English, American English AND Indian English are subtle yet significant.
But again, I digress.
The exponential growth in civilization is directly traceable to the lifting of the prohibition against the sharing of knowledge. When enough people had learned to read the 'news industry was born to cater to a knowledge hungry populace...and if what was dispensed turned out to be falsehood well, everybody makes mistakes and people were made wiser by having to pick out the fly shit from the pepper of information.
If your thinking parts didn't work too well you didn't perform this task...er, pretty much at all. You glommed it all down and waited until you stuck your foot in your mouth in front of your more erudite peers...and they all got a good laugh...at YOUR expense.
So it is the idea came along that some parents weren't very good teachers and maybe it was time to 'formalize' the educational process. Imagine the progress that could be made if education were 'standardized'!
Now I ask you to step back a moment and mentally review what you were TAUGHT [from either source, your parent's knee or in school] about how the world 'works'...
What were you taught about the legal construct that dominates your life? If this question throws you the problem is considerably deeper than you suspect...and you may be incapable of handling the truth.
What were you taught about the Wealth Protection services? Weren't you told that they were YOUR FRIEND and that they were 'public servants' (this in reality redefines the term 'protection racket' [although you have since learned this was nowhere near the truth.] Once again we find your education receives a failing grade.
Finally, [not because this is an inclusive list but because the point is made] what were you taught about the mechanics of commerce [nevermind its 'purpose', there are degreed economists that remain ignorant of the purpose of commerce!]
While an 'educated' populace benefits us all, and ignorant populace makes the few rich, especially if those few dominate the 'justice process'.
Just a final breadcrumb before the system overloads again.
Thanks for taking the time to learn!
Gegner [The modern day Cassandra]
* read Royal
Today's headlines tell us [like the 'they came out of nowhere' tax cuts] that 'Republicans' [read campaign donors] are lining up behind 'school choice'.
[Like a dog whistle, 'school choice' harkens back to the now ancient public schools vs private school debate...imagine where you'd be if your parents had to pay for your education. For a vast majority of us school wouldn't even be an option, the rich aren't rich because they give it away! [Despite the 'it' in question being 'free' to the '*connected'.]
Why are the rich, 'rich'? {don't teach you this in school either!} Because they belong to the 'chain of bondage' that enslaves the non-rich! [Money is a chimera, you need it while they can have all they want so long as they force you to 'perform']
Understand, society [to them] isn't possible without slavery. How fucked up is that?
These are the same people conspiring to take away your kids right to an inadequate indoctrination, an 'education' with so many holes in it most will never figure out why they are perpetually on the wrong end of the stick...need a mirror?
Again it's not the money but the privilege that makes one a political mover and shaker [considering most politicians are 'rich' compared to the people that chose them...out of two possible choices because that's all you get, either libtard or conservo-whacko.
[Gegner has no truck with 'party politics' that have proven repeatedly they are self-serving!] What use is it to be a 'party member' when 'the opposition' controls BOTH Parties?
[Doesn't matter who you vote into office if they both take their marching orders from the same people.]
I'm sure I've lost some of you so to get back on the same page we need to rewind to the early debates regarding 'public education'. Back in the day only the wealthy [read *connected] could afford to provide their children with an 'education' beyond what they could learn at their parent's knee.
Humans being incurable mimics clamored to be 'educated' (which initially came out of the Church's archives of documented events...and was the strict domain of the priesthood.
Those who 'ruled' the land by military might were able to extract certain 'concessions' from those who ruled ignorance and their (male) children came to be included in the programs designed to indoctrinate young priests. [The Dark Ages proved just how 'dangerous' knowledge could be. It gave people 'ideas' when they were supposed to be focused on 'the glory of God'.]
But that's another debate.
Along came the Reformation and with it a general increase in knowledge. The 'awareness' of reading drove a thirst for knowledge among the ignorant and soon those who couldn't read or write found themselves the butt of crude jokes but the cruelest cut was they were also branded stupid and that was intolerable.
Naturally moving out from under the safety of the rocks meant we needed to learn how to live in larger 'communes' [the base root of communities.]
It soon became 'intolerable' to find oneself at an 'educational disadvantage' and the peasants made their displeasure known.
Our mimics taught one another (although thanks to inbred pigheadedness what you were taught was often incorrect.) [Like the assholes that cheaped out and let India take over the dictionary used for 'spellcheck' creating a considerable bastardization of American English because the differences between the Queen's English, American English AND Indian English are subtle yet significant.
But again, I digress.
The exponential growth in civilization is directly traceable to the lifting of the prohibition against the sharing of knowledge. When enough people had learned to read the 'news industry was born to cater to a knowledge hungry populace...and if what was dispensed turned out to be falsehood well, everybody makes mistakes and people were made wiser by having to pick out the fly shit from the pepper of information.
If your thinking parts didn't work too well you didn't perform this task...er, pretty much at all. You glommed it all down and waited until you stuck your foot in your mouth in front of your more erudite peers...and they all got a good laugh...at YOUR expense.
So it is the idea came along that some parents weren't very good teachers and maybe it was time to 'formalize' the educational process. Imagine the progress that could be made if education were 'standardized'!
Now I ask you to step back a moment and mentally review what you were TAUGHT [from either source, your parent's knee or in school] about how the world 'works'...
What were you taught about the legal construct that dominates your life? If this question throws you the problem is considerably deeper than you suspect...and you may be incapable of handling the truth.
What were you taught about the Wealth Protection services? Weren't you told that they were YOUR FRIEND and that they were 'public servants' (this in reality redefines the term 'protection racket' [although you have since learned this was nowhere near the truth.] Once again we find your education receives a failing grade.
Finally, [not because this is an inclusive list but because the point is made] what were you taught about the mechanics of commerce [nevermind its 'purpose', there are degreed economists that remain ignorant of the purpose of commerce!]
While an 'educated' populace benefits us all, and ignorant populace makes the few rich, especially if those few dominate the 'justice process'.
Just a final breadcrumb before the system overloads again.
Thanks for taking the time to learn!
Gegner [The modern day Cassandra]
* read Royal
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you can't stay on topic then don't say anything...