Greetings good citizen, I can na take it no mo! Try as I may, the stupid just keeps getting deeper.
While we'd like to think editorials are accepted at the NY Times based on merit but one of today's entries indicates either a desperate attempt to appear 'unbiased' or quite literally the bottom of the barrel.
What part of 'Democracy is intended only for the Gods' do you think caught the editor's eye?
However it does provide the opportunity to point out a glaring defect in what we are 'taught' is democracy...because it ain't.
Democracy is a participative form of decision-making yet we only use it to pick who will make decisions in our name without EVER consulting us.
As we have seen over the past 243 years, this system sucks but the people who forced it upon us like it just fine so it hasn't changed.
The 'defect' is the practice of using the 'law' to rule and the need to create new legislation, literally on demand so the feckless can 'legalize' their predation.
For justice to reign, the law must remain beyond the reach of the feckless and their 'loaded' courts. The 'jury system' was designed to facilitate that goal but the hallowed founders weren't interested in justice, they wanted ownership and the absolute authority to stymie any who objected.
So it is the system itself rests athwart of mutual survival and has given birth to endless strife, twice on a global scale.
Yet like Cassandra, my words fall upon deaf ears.
Nor am I vain enough to think I am the only one being squelched via prohibited keyword combinations.
Some topics you just can't shine the light of truth upon (without 'editorial approval.')
Yea, treachery is a crime against all humanity yet the traitors are well paid for their subterfuge. [Think we got us a 'money problem' that needs dealing with?]
Now do you think outlawing cash and making money non-transferable is a good idea?
Security against Treason by far outweighs your desire to liquidate your trash or sell your way to success, consequences be damned.
Most agree but the same people who are enthralled with cash are unable to visualize a world without it.
You needn't take my word for it, the ONLY reason CASH exists is to facilitate CRIME!
You have cash so you can be robbed but you are too dumb to realize this. [While we are on the topic of 'defects'.]
The other defect staring most of you in the face is your inability to put your humanity first and your inbred fear of the other.
Step back with me in time for a moment, back to our space alien origin story where we were all brought here as forced labor and before we could work the mines we were conscripted to slaughter whoever was working them when we arrived.
Back & forth this went until we were abandoned here after the mines played out. Looks like the 'white devils' were the most successful but they too were abandoned in place, just as 'expendable' as the rest.
The backbone of my 'space opera' is the vexation of the clones, who after achieving victory over their slaver creators remain unable to find space not under Imperial control, it becomes their holy grail, finding space not already dominated by their gene manipulating creators [who have succeeded in making themselves immortal and use clones so as not to risk their immortality facing the multiple perils of space.]
It also answers the final question of would you clone be your 'property' to condemn as you wished. Ethically speaking clones, like immortals are an abomination. [Yet everybody knows all the feckless are working to solve the mortality problem, naturally before we crack the initial 'worthiness dilemma'.]
Don't you wish, like that old tune by the Who, that we 'Won't be fooled Again' were true?
For that to happen you have to start using it for more than a hat rack.
Until next time, Head.
Gegner
While we'd like to think editorials are accepted at the NY Times based on merit but one of today's entries indicates either a desperate attempt to appear 'unbiased' or quite literally the bottom of the barrel.
What part of 'Democracy is intended only for the Gods' do you think caught the editor's eye?
However it does provide the opportunity to point out a glaring defect in what we are 'taught' is democracy...because it ain't.
Democracy is a participative form of decision-making yet we only use it to pick who will make decisions in our name without EVER consulting us.
As we have seen over the past 243 years, this system sucks but the people who forced it upon us like it just fine so it hasn't changed.
The 'defect' is the practice of using the 'law' to rule and the need to create new legislation, literally on demand so the feckless can 'legalize' their predation.
For justice to reign, the law must remain beyond the reach of the feckless and their 'loaded' courts. The 'jury system' was designed to facilitate that goal but the hallowed founders weren't interested in justice, they wanted ownership and the absolute authority to stymie any who objected.
So it is the system itself rests athwart of mutual survival and has given birth to endless strife, twice on a global scale.
Yet like Cassandra, my words fall upon deaf ears.
Nor am I vain enough to think I am the only one being squelched via prohibited keyword combinations.
Some topics you just can't shine the light of truth upon (without 'editorial approval.')
Yea, treachery is a crime against all humanity yet the traitors are well paid for their subterfuge. [Think we got us a 'money problem' that needs dealing with?]
Now do you think outlawing cash and making money non-transferable is a good idea?
Security against Treason by far outweighs your desire to liquidate your trash or sell your way to success, consequences be damned.
Most agree but the same people who are enthralled with cash are unable to visualize a world without it.
You needn't take my word for it, the ONLY reason CASH exists is to facilitate CRIME!
You have cash so you can be robbed but you are too dumb to realize this. [While we are on the topic of 'defects'.]
The other defect staring most of you in the face is your inability to put your humanity first and your inbred fear of the other.
Step back with me in time for a moment, back to our space alien origin story where we were all brought here as forced labor and before we could work the mines we were conscripted to slaughter whoever was working them when we arrived.
Back & forth this went until we were abandoned here after the mines played out. Looks like the 'white devils' were the most successful but they too were abandoned in place, just as 'expendable' as the rest.
The backbone of my 'space opera' is the vexation of the clones, who after achieving victory over their slaver creators remain unable to find space not under Imperial control, it becomes their holy grail, finding space not already dominated by their gene manipulating creators [who have succeeded in making themselves immortal and use clones so as not to risk their immortality facing the multiple perils of space.]
It also answers the final question of would you clone be your 'property' to condemn as you wished. Ethically speaking clones, like immortals are an abomination. [Yet everybody knows all the feckless are working to solve the mortality problem, naturally before we crack the initial 'worthiness dilemma'.]
Don't you wish, like that old tune by the Who, that we 'Won't be fooled Again' were true?
For that to happen you have to start using it for more than a hat rack.
Until next time, Head.
Gegner
the hallowed founders weren't interested in justice, they wanted ownership and the absolute authority to stymie any who objected.
ReplyDeleteDemocracy is a participative form of decision-making yet we only use it to pick who will make decisions in our name without EVER consulting us.
ReplyDeleteFor justice to reign, the law must remain beyond the reach of the feckless and their 'loaded' courts. The 'jury system' was designed to facilitate that goal but the hallowed founders weren't interested in justice, they wanted ownership and the absolute authority to stymie any who objected.
ReplyDeleteDon't you wish, like that old tune by the Who, that we 'Won't be fooled Again' were true?
ReplyDeleteFor that to happen you have to start using it for more than a hat rack.