Greetings good citizen, like the profile says, I'm an 'outspoken critic' and pull no punches...although I admit to sometimes biting my tongue when perhaps I shouldn't.
If you're wondering when the most recent incident of holding myself in check occurred it was just moment's ago on my morning visit to SAR, my 'go to' source for the pulse of the blogosphere.
Seems as though Mr. Trump's cyber-soldiers are on the march, protecting their champion from his (sure to be fatal) case of 'foot-in-mouth' disease.
Apparently anyone that parrot's the media's mock outrage over Trump's rhetorical request that the Russians 'hack' Hillary's private server to recover her 'lost e-mails', well, here we butt up once again to a citizen's 'right' to speak their mind [unless it reveals an inconvenient truth, then it's not cool!]
And forming the opinion that Mr. Trump's lack of control over his mouth makes him a poor candidate for 'meat-puppet-in-Chief' is also evidence that you've drank the 'Democratic Kool-Aid'.
But this is neither here nor there regarding 'the stick in my craw', it's the rift created in a party that had pinned it's hopes on the Sanders candidacy.
Then that man rolled over and played dead when we finally arrived at the convention floor.
Which is to clarify that while there may not be any 'real democrats' in politics after Morning in America, there are plenty of us left out here in the trenches, abandoned by those who claim to 'lead' our party.
Now 'Uncle Tom Obama' is 'passing the baton' to the woman that stepped aside 8 years ago in what was then suspected and is now an apparent 'quid pro quo' arrangement.
Where Bernie figures into this is rather diabolical considering the Clinton's are the embodiment of the term 'Dino'. [Willy-Jeff single handedly unraveled the New Deal with the full support of a Republican dominated congress! although it should be noted that St. Ronnie is responsible for 'laying the groundwork' for that crime against the public.]
Let's have a look at the 'legacy' of 'Uncle Tom Obama' shall we?
Did he end the war in the Middle East? Did he prosecute the war criminals, Bush & Cheney? Did he prosecute the banksters that pillaged a generation's retirement funds? Did he close Guantanamo Bay?
Well, we all know the answer to all of those questions is No...and Hillary promises 'more of the same'...
Given Bernie's role as the 'Judas Goat' we can only wonder who will be the next traitor to hold up Democratic principles only to betray them at the last minute? [Are they setting Elizabeth Warren up for the next fall?]
I already told you what we can expect from Hillary, we will get a largely meaningless repeal of Citizen's United' followed by another failed attempt at the ERA, then it will be time to re-elect her and she will do nothing in her last term, just like her predecessor, Uncle Tom.
Um, probably shouldn't use 'archaic' references like Uncle Tom (which back in the day was a powerful insult to anyone 'of color'.)
You see, Uncle Tom [and by extention an 'Uncle Tom nigger'] was perfectly fine with being a slave so long as Massa was happy.
And Uncle Tom Obama has bent over backwards keeping 'Massa' happy. He considers his constituency to be the same as W's, 'the Haves and the Have Mores!'
It is with zero irony that Hillary embraces the same 'constituency.'
So, am I siding with Trump?
No.. and I use the same logic when the choice was between Gore and W. I want somebody that can spell moron as opposed to just being one [and I'm still pretty sure Al Gore can spell moron without skipping a beat although getting 'outmanuevered' as he did in the Florida recount debacle wasn't an inspiring display of 'leadership'.
It was, however, a sure sign that what passes for democracy in this nation had been 'hi-jacked.'
Were we to stop and examine the historical record we would find numerous incidents of 'suspicious activity' as well as volumes of evidence all is not 'as advertised' in this nation's 'political operating system'.
So it is we arrive at 'quiz time'. Who runs the day to day operations of officialdom? Civil servants. Who do those civil servants work for? [Technically YOU but the POLITICIANS YOU (allegedly) elect have direct control over those 'minions'.]
Take a good look at the political landscape and look at where the whole political process begins?
With the people who 'own' the media.
While more common today, wealthy people becoming politicians used to be a rarity...and mounting a campaign even for a regional office was then and remains an expensive proposition.
So if you want to 'serve' the public it all starts with what? Raising funds to run for the post.
And where do those funds come from?
Short answer...'the Haves and the Have Mores!'
So how 'represented' are you?
Short answer...Zippo!
Does anyone else find it curious that the net is suddenly filled with polls seeking your 'opinion' of Uncle Tom?
Hmmn...[why do you think they want to know?]
Well, Thank you for letting me inside your head,
Gegner
If you're wondering when the most recent incident of holding myself in check occurred it was just moment's ago on my morning visit to SAR, my 'go to' source for the pulse of the blogosphere.
Seems as though Mr. Trump's cyber-soldiers are on the march, protecting their champion from his (sure to be fatal) case of 'foot-in-mouth' disease.
Apparently anyone that parrot's the media's mock outrage over Trump's rhetorical request that the Russians 'hack' Hillary's private server to recover her 'lost e-mails', well, here we butt up once again to a citizen's 'right' to speak their mind [unless it reveals an inconvenient truth, then it's not cool!]
And forming the opinion that Mr. Trump's lack of control over his mouth makes him a poor candidate for 'meat-puppet-in-Chief' is also evidence that you've drank the 'Democratic Kool-Aid'.
But this is neither here nor there regarding 'the stick in my craw', it's the rift created in a party that had pinned it's hopes on the Sanders candidacy.
Then that man rolled over and played dead when we finally arrived at the convention floor.
Which is to clarify that while there may not be any 'real democrats' in politics after Morning in America, there are plenty of us left out here in the trenches, abandoned by those who claim to 'lead' our party.
Now 'Uncle Tom Obama' is 'passing the baton' to the woman that stepped aside 8 years ago in what was then suspected and is now an apparent 'quid pro quo' arrangement.
Where Bernie figures into this is rather diabolical considering the Clinton's are the embodiment of the term 'Dino'. [Willy-Jeff single handedly unraveled the New Deal with the full support of a Republican dominated congress! although it should be noted that St. Ronnie is responsible for 'laying the groundwork' for that crime against the public.]
Let's have a look at the 'legacy' of 'Uncle Tom Obama' shall we?
Did he end the war in the Middle East? Did he prosecute the war criminals, Bush & Cheney? Did he prosecute the banksters that pillaged a generation's retirement funds? Did he close Guantanamo Bay?
Well, we all know the answer to all of those questions is No...and Hillary promises 'more of the same'...
Given Bernie's role as the 'Judas Goat' we can only wonder who will be the next traitor to hold up Democratic principles only to betray them at the last minute? [Are they setting Elizabeth Warren up for the next fall?]
I already told you what we can expect from Hillary, we will get a largely meaningless repeal of Citizen's United' followed by another failed attempt at the ERA, then it will be time to re-elect her and she will do nothing in her last term, just like her predecessor, Uncle Tom.
Um, probably shouldn't use 'archaic' references like Uncle Tom (which back in the day was a powerful insult to anyone 'of color'.)
You see, Uncle Tom [and by extention an 'Uncle Tom nigger'] was perfectly fine with being a slave so long as Massa was happy.
And Uncle Tom Obama has bent over backwards keeping 'Massa' happy. He considers his constituency to be the same as W's, 'the Haves and the Have Mores!'
It is with zero irony that Hillary embraces the same 'constituency.'
So, am I siding with Trump?
No.. and I use the same logic when the choice was between Gore and W. I want somebody that can spell moron as opposed to just being one [and I'm still pretty sure Al Gore can spell moron without skipping a beat although getting 'outmanuevered' as he did in the Florida recount debacle wasn't an inspiring display of 'leadership'.
It was, however, a sure sign that what passes for democracy in this nation had been 'hi-jacked.'
Were we to stop and examine the historical record we would find numerous incidents of 'suspicious activity' as well as volumes of evidence all is not 'as advertised' in this nation's 'political operating system'.
So it is we arrive at 'quiz time'. Who runs the day to day operations of officialdom? Civil servants. Who do those civil servants work for? [Technically YOU but the POLITICIANS YOU (allegedly) elect have direct control over those 'minions'.]
Take a good look at the political landscape and look at where the whole political process begins?
With the people who 'own' the media.
While more common today, wealthy people becoming politicians used to be a rarity...and mounting a campaign even for a regional office was then and remains an expensive proposition.
So if you want to 'serve' the public it all starts with what? Raising funds to run for the post.
And where do those funds come from?
Short answer...'the Haves and the Have Mores!'
So how 'represented' are you?
Short answer...Zippo!
Does anyone else find it curious that the net is suddenly filled with polls seeking your 'opinion' of Uncle Tom?
Hmmn...[why do you think they want to know?]
Well, Thank you for letting me inside your head,
Gegner
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you can't stay on topic then don't say anything...