Greetings good citizen, did someone rescue Trump and the Republican party from themselves? The attack that resulted in the death of a member of the US armed forces is a gift that continues to keep giving for the 'Flip-Flopper-in-Chief'.
Rewind to 2001 and the assault on the nation 'suspected' of harboring Osama bin laden. It was not Afghanistan that gave bin laden safe haven but the the Taliban, widely recognized as 'Muslim Extremists' who were 'removed from power' when the US invaded in 2001.
I needed to 'verify' the exact year [there was a considerable delay between 9/11 and the puzzling Middle East invasion of 2 nations with no obvious connection to the Saudi hijackers were invaded for the crime of harboring terrorists.]
Eighteen years is a long time and those born into conservative, evangelical families are likely clueless to the true circumstances surrounding historical events leading up to the longest armed conflict in modern history.
Were we to investigate it is 'likely' that we'd discover the children raised by the 'true believers' have been 'led to believe' that the US is on a 'mission from God'.
So why was numbnuts even talking to the suicide bombing Taliban?
Honor among thieves?
[Here even the cognizant might be confused...again at what price peace as opposed to the fact that nobody thinks the Mafia disappeared/disbanded because it is no longer making headlines, if you're picking up what I'm laying down...]
Criminals have a tendency to, er, 'overlook' the criminal organizations of other cultures because cooperation is more 'profitable' than hostility. [If only we could get the law abiding to comprehend that in order to overcome the criminals we must first stand united against them...it will be a lot easier to do when cash is outlawed.]
Given the correlation between cash and crime why hasn't this been done long ago? Stupid lawmakers or should we substitute dumb for 'corrupt'?
The BULL stops here good citizen so if it is to be, it is up to thee.
[Perhaps it is time to get a 'true accounting' because everybody knows 'the books' are WAY out of whack.]
Funny how the 'go along to get along' system obscures just how badly you are being 'chumped' (so 'a few' can be 'rich'.)
Do the criminals care? Of course not, this is the 'law of the jungle', prey or be preyed upon...and that is the 'attitude' we must 'wipe out' with extreme prejudice.
Is banishment 'too harsh'?
Consider the consequences...don't know what those are? You're soaking in them!
Go along to get along = I got mine F-YOU!
EVERY TIME.
So let's return to why the question of why the Moron-in-Chief was 'negotiating' with the organization we originally forcibly ousted for providing sanctuary to Osama bin Laden? [They 'refused' to surrender him, remember that.]
Keep that one in mind when you are standing in the polling station, deciding what is 'best' for the future...
The media operates on the belief that the public doesn't remember one day to the next and that MOST PEOPLE will swallow whatever they are told because life is to hectic to keep track of the multiple piles of horseshit they are fed.
That part is true.
You are the media's victim, they treat you like a mushroom, keeping you in the dark while feeding you copious amounts of bullshit.
What should we do to the feckless media?
Fire 'em all, same answer as the entire 'legal' system, the politicians and the 'owner class' that already pretends it doesn't exist.
Fun fact: wipe out 'ownership' and you will wipe out organized crime in one fell swoop!
Until next time, Stinky!
Gegner
Rewind to 2001 and the assault on the nation 'suspected' of harboring Osama bin laden. It was not Afghanistan that gave bin laden safe haven but the the Taliban, widely recognized as 'Muslim Extremists' who were 'removed from power' when the US invaded in 2001.
I needed to 'verify' the exact year [there was a considerable delay between 9/11 and the puzzling Middle East invasion of 2 nations with no obvious connection to the Saudi hijackers were invaded for the crime of harboring terrorists.]
Eighteen years is a long time and those born into conservative, evangelical families are likely clueless to the true circumstances surrounding historical events leading up to the longest armed conflict in modern history.
Were we to investigate it is 'likely' that we'd discover the children raised by the 'true believers' have been 'led to believe' that the US is on a 'mission from God'.
So why was numbnuts even talking to the suicide bombing Taliban?
Honor among thieves?
[Here even the cognizant might be confused...again at what price peace as opposed to the fact that nobody thinks the Mafia disappeared/disbanded because it is no longer making headlines, if you're picking up what I'm laying down...]
Criminals have a tendency to, er, 'overlook' the criminal organizations of other cultures because cooperation is more 'profitable' than hostility. [If only we could get the law abiding to comprehend that in order to overcome the criminals we must first stand united against them...it will be a lot easier to do when cash is outlawed.]
Given the correlation between cash and crime why hasn't this been done long ago? Stupid lawmakers or should we substitute dumb for 'corrupt'?
The BULL stops here good citizen so if it is to be, it is up to thee.
[Perhaps it is time to get a 'true accounting' because everybody knows 'the books' are WAY out of whack.]
Funny how the 'go along to get along' system obscures just how badly you are being 'chumped' (so 'a few' can be 'rich'.)
Do the criminals care? Of course not, this is the 'law of the jungle', prey or be preyed upon...and that is the 'attitude' we must 'wipe out' with extreme prejudice.
Is banishment 'too harsh'?
Consider the consequences...don't know what those are? You're soaking in them!
Go along to get along = I got mine F-YOU!
EVERY TIME.
So let's return to why the question of why the Moron-in-Chief was 'negotiating' with the organization we originally forcibly ousted for providing sanctuary to Osama bin Laden? [They 'refused' to surrender him, remember that.]
Keep that one in mind when you are standing in the polling station, deciding what is 'best' for the future...
The media operates on the belief that the public doesn't remember one day to the next and that MOST PEOPLE will swallow whatever they are told because life is to hectic to keep track of the multiple piles of horseshit they are fed.
That part is true.
You are the media's victim, they treat you like a mushroom, keeping you in the dark while feeding you copious amounts of bullshit.
What should we do to the feckless media?
Fire 'em all, same answer as the entire 'legal' system, the politicians and the 'owner class' that already pretends it doesn't exist.
Fun fact: wipe out 'ownership' and you will wipe out organized crime in one fell swoop!
Until next time, Stinky!
Gegner
So let's return to why the question of why the Moron-in-Chief was 'negotiating' with the organization we originally forcibly ousted for providing sanctuary to Osama bin Laden? [They 'refused' to surrender him, remember that.]
ReplyDeleteGiven the correlation between cash and crime why hasn't this been done long ago? Stupid lawmakers or should we substitute dumb for 'corrupt'?
ReplyDeleteWhat should we do to the feckless media?
ReplyDeleteFox should lose its charter, that would be a big start.