Greetings good citizen, I wish I could report having a pleasant two day break but that wouldn't be true. Still, nothing to be gained by dwelling on the negative so let's stop with the boo-hoo and get on with the holy fuck.
The 'clear-eyed' cognizant know that the deceased Mr. Epstein swindled his way to a fortune 'piggy-backing' on his well heeled connections. What was his secret? He was sleazy enough to be believe-able...that and the 'wealthy' aren't any smarter than the rest of us. [Again with the morons who equate wealth with intelligence...and even wisdom. Even the rich point to god and bless their 'luck' (that they haven't been prosecuted for their crimes against humanity.)]
The odd part is the swindlers who are trying to turn the Epstein suicide into something other than the 'payback' it was. Part of Jeffery's success was caused by his being dirty and that dirt, by necessity would rub off on the people associated with him.
So it is the 'used' are trying to use him.
Before it vanishes into the brain fog that has become your mind, let me point out that the whole situation stems from the basic dishonesty that permeates our society from top to bottom, exceeded only by the willful ignorance of the hopelessly dumb.
Remember ying and yang? For each bit of 'darkness' I point out, I balance it with a solution of how the situation can be corrected.
No correction is possible with the current corrupt justice system, the fact it is 'for profit' is all the evidence needed to damn it for the criminal venture it is.
That said, if cash were outlawed, crimes like Jeffery's wouldn't happen. Numbnuts would have taken a job, tried to get himself appointed to a made up position and exiled along with whoever was stupid enough to try to make such a thing happen.
Jeffery was a successful swindler because we are neck deep in stupid and nobody can remember a single instance when justice has prevailed so steeped in corruption is our culture.
The sleazy will always be with us no matter how many safeguards we enact. How unfortunate for mankind that the justice system itself attracts sleazeballs like no other? [It's that 'power corrupts' thing and there is no getting rid of it.]
Abolishing 'ownership' would go a long way towards minimizing the sleazeball's ardor to play the rest of us for chumps.
We are living in a toxic stew that is 99.999% Swindled and .001% swindler. It is the 'stickiness' of dirt that keeps infecting those entrusted to protect us from the predators among us.
Worse, all they have to do is slip a little and the swindler owns them. [Sometimes not even that!]
It is here that the debate hinges on punishing the criminals...if there were no punishment perhaps the enforcers would be less fearful of being prosecuted? Sorry, that doesn't work. If punishment is to be a 'deterrent' it must be 'effective' and that means it must remove the criminal permanently.
[Unlike the criminal enterprise we call 'prison'. Prison is a safety net for criminals, it saves them from banishment, which is their just due.]
It is when there are no alternatives that society and civilization totters towards inevitable collapse.
If you can't 'see' the future there won't be one.
If there is no protection from the criminals (who would exploit you and your children for their own gain) and your entire existence is dedicated to getting chumped as little as possible life is not worth living.
It all flows from justice, equal inclusion that provides you with a means to contribute to society and to be fairly compensated for that contribution.
Without justice life is worthless.
Happy Monday, Head.
Gegner
The 'clear-eyed' cognizant know that the deceased Mr. Epstein swindled his way to a fortune 'piggy-backing' on his well heeled connections. What was his secret? He was sleazy enough to be believe-able...that and the 'wealthy' aren't any smarter than the rest of us. [Again with the morons who equate wealth with intelligence...and even wisdom. Even the rich point to god and bless their 'luck' (that they haven't been prosecuted for their crimes against humanity.)]
The odd part is the swindlers who are trying to turn the Epstein suicide into something other than the 'payback' it was. Part of Jeffery's success was caused by his being dirty and that dirt, by necessity would rub off on the people associated with him.
So it is the 'used' are trying to use him.
Before it vanishes into the brain fog that has become your mind, let me point out that the whole situation stems from the basic dishonesty that permeates our society from top to bottom, exceeded only by the willful ignorance of the hopelessly dumb.
Remember ying and yang? For each bit of 'darkness' I point out, I balance it with a solution of how the situation can be corrected.
No correction is possible with the current corrupt justice system, the fact it is 'for profit' is all the evidence needed to damn it for the criminal venture it is.
That said, if cash were outlawed, crimes like Jeffery's wouldn't happen. Numbnuts would have taken a job, tried to get himself appointed to a made up position and exiled along with whoever was stupid enough to try to make such a thing happen.
Jeffery was a successful swindler because we are neck deep in stupid and nobody can remember a single instance when justice has prevailed so steeped in corruption is our culture.
The sleazy will always be with us no matter how many safeguards we enact. How unfortunate for mankind that the justice system itself attracts sleazeballs like no other? [It's that 'power corrupts' thing and there is no getting rid of it.]
Abolishing 'ownership' would go a long way towards minimizing the sleazeball's ardor to play the rest of us for chumps.
We are living in a toxic stew that is 99.999% Swindled and .001% swindler. It is the 'stickiness' of dirt that keeps infecting those entrusted to protect us from the predators among us.
Worse, all they have to do is slip a little and the swindler owns them. [Sometimes not even that!]
It is here that the debate hinges on punishing the criminals...if there were no punishment perhaps the enforcers would be less fearful of being prosecuted? Sorry, that doesn't work. If punishment is to be a 'deterrent' it must be 'effective' and that means it must remove the criminal permanently.
[Unlike the criminal enterprise we call 'prison'. Prison is a safety net for criminals, it saves them from banishment, which is their just due.]
It is when there are no alternatives that society and civilization totters towards inevitable collapse.
If you can't 'see' the future there won't be one.
If there is no protection from the criminals (who would exploit you and your children for their own gain) and your entire existence is dedicated to getting chumped as little as possible life is not worth living.
It all flows from justice, equal inclusion that provides you with a means to contribute to society and to be fairly compensated for that contribution.
Without justice life is worthless.
Happy Monday, Head.
Gegner
Abolishing 'ownership' would go a long way towards minimizing the sleazeball's ardor to play the rest of us for chumps.
ReplyDeleteWhy isn't the media/echo chamber that is attempting to paint the Epstein suicide/murder as something the Clintons/ (fake) Democrats had a hand in. THe fact that there are multiple witnesses to the fact there were more than one shooter in both Dayton & El Paso? Why the silence?