Greetings good citizen, seems as though I've finally done it. I have parsed rudderless so many times that I can't create a new way to draw attention to the fact that we can't agree on what's broken, nevermind what to do about ANY of it.
Like all CF's you just have to pick one thing and start in on it. Strategically speaking that one thing should be universally important to everyone like 'mutual survival'.
We have to stop the criminals from exploiting people out of existence for their own enrichment.
Does this start with criminalizing the owner class (considering survival and ownership are in direct defiance of one another?) It is also in direct defiance of the conventions that prevent us from murdering one another on sight.
So why do we tolerate the 'owner class'? There should be no such thing but critical to the owner's survival is their lock on the media and its control of 'public opinion' [whether it is true or not.]
Banish/prosecute ownership and the media problem takes care of itself. [Sorry talking head, you are going to have to pass a rigorous vetting process if you want to sit in front of that keyboard/microphone/camera again.]
{This creates a 'new problem' of how to we keep the feckless from seizing control of the newly cleaned slate? The thing to be avoided here is the illusion of clean. Changing one liar for one we aren't familiar with isn't the positive forward movement we want/need to achieve.}
Making the system 'accountable' is the only safeguard we can install. Today's lying liars aren't even charged under the 'injustice' system that exists Solely to protect OWNERSHIP RIGHTS instead of protecting the public from the pathological liars among us!
Humanity won't survive if the few continue to be allowed to OWN what the rest of us need to survive.
One needn't be a genius to work out that this isn't the recipe for success.
So is it any mystery that people are unable to work out that elected officeholders are beholden to their campaign contributors/OWNERS!
Shouldn't leaders be required to 'prove themselves'?
What 'use/good' is a leader without vision (or if that vision is psychotic like the current leader's?)
How will we succeed as a species if we fail to understand that survival/mutual is vital to that success?
The world of I is not just 'lonely' it's downright psychotic...only psychopaths think in terms of 'Me First!'
I belabor the obvious when I point out that OWNERSHIP and everything connected to selfishness and self dealing [stock markets anyone?] are the primary targets in putting our species back on the path of survival.
Without each other, not only will none of us survive but our children are well and truly...and you don't want to do that to them.
Understand, we didn't 'lose our way', we were driven to this nasty place by morons who cared more about themselves than the future of our kind!
Society itself has been 'poisoned' against itself. Most of us would kill someone than listen to them.
Which is to opine that the situation is pretty far gone. [Take a bow, conservo-whackos!]
As today's title implies, the choice is as it always has been, YOUR'S.
Follow me if you want to survive.
Not for you? Then do the rest of us the favor of grabbing your gun and mowing down as many fake owners as you can on your way to 'freedom-personal'.
Remember to die with your mouth open, that Valkyrie coming for you isn't going to take you to Valhalla, but she does need to take a squat and she wants to top you up before she sends you to hell, you selfish cunt!
Happy Friday, Head!
Gegner
Like all CF's you just have to pick one thing and start in on it. Strategically speaking that one thing should be universally important to everyone like 'mutual survival'.
We have to stop the criminals from exploiting people out of existence for their own enrichment.
Does this start with criminalizing the owner class (considering survival and ownership are in direct defiance of one another?) It is also in direct defiance of the conventions that prevent us from murdering one another on sight.
So why do we tolerate the 'owner class'? There should be no such thing but critical to the owner's survival is their lock on the media and its control of 'public opinion' [whether it is true or not.]
Banish/prosecute ownership and the media problem takes care of itself. [Sorry talking head, you are going to have to pass a rigorous vetting process if you want to sit in front of that keyboard/microphone/camera again.]
{This creates a 'new problem' of how to we keep the feckless from seizing control of the newly cleaned slate? The thing to be avoided here is the illusion of clean. Changing one liar for one we aren't familiar with isn't the positive forward movement we want/need to achieve.}
Making the system 'accountable' is the only safeguard we can install. Today's lying liars aren't even charged under the 'injustice' system that exists Solely to protect OWNERSHIP RIGHTS instead of protecting the public from the pathological liars among us!
Humanity won't survive if the few continue to be allowed to OWN what the rest of us need to survive.
One needn't be a genius to work out that this isn't the recipe for success.
So is it any mystery that people are unable to work out that elected officeholders are beholden to their campaign contributors/OWNERS!
Shouldn't leaders be required to 'prove themselves'?
What 'use/good' is a leader without vision (or if that vision is psychotic like the current leader's?)
How will we succeed as a species if we fail to understand that survival/mutual is vital to that success?
The world of I is not just 'lonely' it's downright psychotic...only psychopaths think in terms of 'Me First!'
I belabor the obvious when I point out that OWNERSHIP and everything connected to selfishness and self dealing [stock markets anyone?] are the primary targets in putting our species back on the path of survival.
Without each other, not only will none of us survive but our children are well and truly...and you don't want to do that to them.
Understand, we didn't 'lose our way', we were driven to this nasty place by morons who cared more about themselves than the future of our kind!
Society itself has been 'poisoned' against itself. Most of us would kill someone than listen to them.
Which is to opine that the situation is pretty far gone. [Take a bow, conservo-whackos!]
As today's title implies, the choice is as it always has been, YOUR'S.
Follow me if you want to survive.
Not for you? Then do the rest of us the favor of grabbing your gun and mowing down as many fake owners as you can on your way to 'freedom-personal'.
Remember to die with your mouth open, that Valkyrie coming for you isn't going to take you to Valhalla, but she does need to take a squat and she wants to top you up before she sends you to hell, you selfish cunt!
Happy Friday, Head!
Gegner
seems as though I've finally done it. I have parsed rudderless so many times that I can't create a new way to draw attention to the fact we can't agree on what's broken, nevermind what to do about ANY of it.
ReplyDeleteHow will we succeed as a species if we fail to understand that survival/mutual is vital to that success?
ReplyDeleteHumanity won't survive if the few continue to be allowed to OWN what the rest of us need to survive.
ReplyDeleteOne needn't be a genius to work out that this isn't the recipe for success.
Shouldn't leaders be required to 'prove themselves'?
ReplyDeleteWhat 'use/good' is a leader without vision (or if that vision is psychotic like the current leader's?)
Making the system 'accountable' is the only safeguard we can install. Today's lying liars aren't even charged under the 'injustice' system that exists Solely to protect OWNERSHIP RIGHTS instead of protecting the public from the pathological liars among us!
ReplyDeleteHumanity won't survive if the few continue to be allowed to OWN what the rest of us need to survive.
How will we succeed as a species if we fail to understand that survival/mutual is vital to that success?
ReplyDeleteAs today's title implies, the choice is as it always has been, YOUR'S.
ReplyDeleteFollow me if you want to survive.
Not for you? Then do the rest of us the favor of grabbing your gun and mowing down as many fake owners as you can on your way to 'freedom-personal'.
ReplyDeleteDoes this start with criminalizing the owner class (considering survival and ownership are in direct defiance of one another?) It is also in direct defiance of the conventions that prevent us from murdering one another on sight.
ReplyDeleteDoes this start with criminalizing the owner class (considering survival and ownership are in direct defiance of one another?) It is also in direct defiance of the conventions that prevent us from murdering one another on sight.
{This creates a 'new problem' of how to we keep the feckless from seizing control of the newly cleaned slate? The thing to be avoided here is the illusion of clean. Changing one liar for one we aren't familiar with isn't the positive forward movement we want/need to achieve.}
ReplyDeleteSo why do we tolerate the 'owner class'? There should be no such thing but critical to the owner's survival is their lock on the media and its control of 'public opinion' [whether it is true or not.]
ReplyDeleteBanish/prosecute ownership and the media problem takes care of itself. [Sorry talking head, you are going to have to pass a rigorous vetting process if you want to sit in front of that keyboard/microphone/camera again.]
ReplyDeleteLike all CF's you just have to pick one thing and start in on it. Strategically speaking that one thing should be universally important to everyone like 'mutual survival'.
ReplyDeleteThe morons that stop with 'survival personal' will die the moment they encounter a problem they can't solve alone, that's why you need to ensure as many of us as possible keep breathing and working!
So why do we tolerate the 'owner class'? There should be no such thing but critical to the owner's survival is their lock on the media and its control of 'public opinion' [whether it is true or not.]
ReplyDeleteMaking the system 'accountable' is the only safeguard we can install. Today's lying liars aren't even charged under the 'injustice' system that exists Solely to protect OWNERSHIP RIGHTS instead of protecting the public from the pathological liars among us!
ReplyDeleteShouldn't leaders be required to 'prove themselves'?
ReplyDeleteWhat 'use/good' is a leader without vision (or if that vision is psychotic like the current leader's?)
Humanity won't survive if the few continue to be allowed to OWN what the rest of us need to survive.
ReplyDeleteOne needn't be a genius to work out that this isn't the recipe for success.
Shouldn't leaders be required to 'prove themselves'?
ReplyDeleteWhat 'use/good' is a leader without vision (or if that vision is psychotic like the current leader's?)
How will we succeed as a species if we fail to understand that survival/mutual is vital to that success?
ReplyDelete