Greetings good citizen, Sunday again and the armchair quarterbacks are out in force, analyzing what the failure of the Hanoi summit with North Korea means.
All of the 'long emergencies' serve but one purpose and even that is a lie. While simmering conflicts serve the purpose of easing military appropriations through a society which would be better served by repairing infrastructure, preparedness, that perpetual hole in the money bag, misallocates resources where they aren't needed and funds to those who have more than they can spend.
Which is to ask would peace cause the global economy to crumble?
It would not.
Then why all the spending and budgetary wrangling on the military when our legislators are supposed to be keeping the economy on an even keel? [You don't need me to tell you they are failing, miserably.]
But I belabor the obvious when I point out that our civilization is grossly mismanaged.
Largely attributable to the decision-making process that we, the feeble-minded, have been 'saddled' with.
Your poor strained attention is constantly being distracted by the wrong question and that won't change until we start qualifying who can do what job.
It goes without saying that everyone currently in a position of authority is fired, for gross incompetence and corruption. [Criminal charges will follow directly.]
When the time comes it WILL be 'that simple'.
Naturally, as water seeks its own level there will be a period where those replacing the incompetent prove to be incompetent themselves [mostly due to their mis-education] and will need to be replaced or new, fragmented/consolidated positions created depending on where the appointee's weaknesses lie.
But yes, it will go exactly like that once we eliminate the corruption that keeps the wheels greased currently.
No cash means straighten up and fly right, you can't pay somebody to handle what you are incapable of. [Remember yesterday's axiom, the 'two kinds of smart'. Well 'smart B' knows they aren't the sharpest thing around when it comes to certain details but he knows who is and he gets them to handle it for them.
How sad this lack of skill is compensated for with money?
Again we don't get the best, we get those 'loyal' to the ones handing out assignments. [These morons are working with Adam Smith's discredited playbook, in case you are wondering why you live in such a wicked, crime ridden society...]
Competence is key but the feckless value loyalty above skill because there is more than one way to put someone in your 'debt'.
There are mirrors everywhere but still none of you can see.
This gives birth to the notion that the public gets the 'government they deserve', condemning future generations to live under unspeakable tyranny because there is nothing the individual can do about the widespread corruption...
That's why we need to outlaw cash.
Forget outlawing guns, the key is eliminating corruption and corruption is 100% cash and carry.
Perhaps we can thank our 'nothing for nothing' mindset because in that single concept lies our redemption!
Thanks once again for taking a moment to learn something...
Gegner
All of the 'long emergencies' serve but one purpose and even that is a lie. While simmering conflicts serve the purpose of easing military appropriations through a society which would be better served by repairing infrastructure, preparedness, that perpetual hole in the money bag, misallocates resources where they aren't needed and funds to those who have more than they can spend.
Which is to ask would peace cause the global economy to crumble?
It would not.
Then why all the spending and budgetary wrangling on the military when our legislators are supposed to be keeping the economy on an even keel? [You don't need me to tell you they are failing, miserably.]
But I belabor the obvious when I point out that our civilization is grossly mismanaged.
Largely attributable to the decision-making process that we, the feeble-minded, have been 'saddled' with.
Your poor strained attention is constantly being distracted by the wrong question and that won't change until we start qualifying who can do what job.
It goes without saying that everyone currently in a position of authority is fired, for gross incompetence and corruption. [Criminal charges will follow directly.]
When the time comes it WILL be 'that simple'.
Naturally, as water seeks its own level there will be a period where those replacing the incompetent prove to be incompetent themselves [mostly due to their mis-education] and will need to be replaced or new, fragmented/consolidated positions created depending on where the appointee's weaknesses lie.
But yes, it will go exactly like that once we eliminate the corruption that keeps the wheels greased currently.
No cash means straighten up and fly right, you can't pay somebody to handle what you are incapable of. [Remember yesterday's axiom, the 'two kinds of smart'. Well 'smart B' knows they aren't the sharpest thing around when it comes to certain details but he knows who is and he gets them to handle it for them.
How sad this lack of skill is compensated for with money?
Again we don't get the best, we get those 'loyal' to the ones handing out assignments. [These morons are working with Adam Smith's discredited playbook, in case you are wondering why you live in such a wicked, crime ridden society...]
Competence is key but the feckless value loyalty above skill because there is more than one way to put someone in your 'debt'.
There are mirrors everywhere but still none of you can see.
This gives birth to the notion that the public gets the 'government they deserve', condemning future generations to live under unspeakable tyranny because there is nothing the individual can do about the widespread corruption...
That's why we need to outlaw cash.
Forget outlawing guns, the key is eliminating corruption and corruption is 100% cash and carry.
Perhaps we can thank our 'nothing for nothing' mindset because in that single concept lies our redemption!
Thanks once again for taking a moment to learn something...
Gegner
Competence is key but the feckless value loyalty above skill because there is more than one way to put someone in your 'debt'.
ReplyDeleteWhich is to ask would peace cause the global economy to crumble?
ReplyDeleteIt would not.
Forget outlawing guns, the key is eliminating corruption and corruption is 100% cash and carry.
ReplyDeleteBut I belabor the obvious when I point out that our civilization is grossly mismanaged.
ReplyDeleteLargely attributable to the decision-making process that we, the feeble-minded, have been 'saddled' with.
All of the 'long emergencies' serve but one purpose and even that is a lie. While simmering conflicts serve the purpose of easing military appropriations through a society which would be better served by repairing infrastructure, preparedness, that perpetual hole in the money bag, misallocates resources where they aren't needed and funds to those who have more than they can spend.
ReplyDeleteWhich is to ask would peace cause the global economy to crumble?
It goes without saying that everyone currently in a position of authority is fired, for gross incompetence and corruption. [Criminal charges will follow directly.]
ReplyDeleteThen why all the spending and budgetary wrangling on the military when our legislators are supposed to be keeping the economy on an even keel? [You don't need me to tell you they are failing, miserably.]
ReplyDeleteBut I belabor the obvious when I point out that our civilization is grossly mismanaged.
All of the 'long emergencies' serve but one purpose and even that is a lie. While simmering conflicts serve the purpose of easing military appropriations through a society which would be better served by repairing infrastructure, preparedness, that perpetual hole in the money bag, misallocates resources where they aren't needed and funds to those who have more than they can spend.
ReplyDelete