Monday, April 8, 2019

1099

Greetings good citizen, while most of us dread receiving today's title, mostly because it means you have to report that tiny side job you'd have preferred no one knew about it also happens to be the number of today's post.

I'm going to guess 1100 posts without a single comment isn't necessarily a record, nor would it be entirely true because I comment all the time...but commenting on you own work is akin to talking to yourself. Nothing wrong with it, it just isn't productive.

Admittedly I leave little room for argument and perhaps the desert of 'we hear ya' is a tribute to you, my readers who display the good sense to not debate/defend the indefensible.

In a departure from the usual I thought rather than cutting one of the elephants from the pack and parading it around for your consideration that we should look at the lead group and, er, examine what their existence portends considering none of you has the stomach to debate such ponderables.

That said we are confronted immediately by the muddiness of the waters. Which pachyderm is in the lead? Is it money or is it population, or to hear the feckless sell it, is it the destruction of our habitat via man made 'climate change'?

Do we have a 'trifecta' with all three charging down the stretch, neck and neck?

What about the 'also rans' of War and the Slaver economic system that the feckless have disguised as 'opportunity' but it is actually an IQ test of the basest kind. [How f'n STUPID are you?]

In this, your persistent silence is damning.

Some of you would cry HALT and point at what the ancient Greeks valued most, despite it being so relative as to be irrelevant.

If you are feckless you would demand the truth [as YOU see it. How unfortunate for the rest of us that your truth is that Barnum was WRONG, it IS possible to fool all of the people, at least most of the time!]

It was misdirection then and it is no different now.

Let's jump off the lead animals and return to the 'also rans'. It is understood that nothing is being done about any of them because the people running things are too busy protecting their own interests that they have lost sight of the 'runaway train' they have created.

The 'basics' of equality, justice and peace/prosperity are, of course, completely absent from the leader group because popularity has zero bearing on effectiveness and even less on the task of pulling an entire species back from the brink.

Think you can vote your way out of this? [shockingly the answer is yes but first the voter must seize the power to keep leadership 'on task'.] Too many cooks (or kooks, same difference.) The solution lies in the plan and the 'patient' implementation of that plan.

Leaders who can't plan also fail to lead. [Do we have a new lead elephant?]

Are you honest enough to recognize the truth when it's laid out before you?

There's the rub, Head!

Remember why I end these little diversions when I do...

Gegner

Burn the party controlled ballot box that doesn't allow YOU to decide ANYTHING from the public square, no more LIES!

11 comments:

  1. That said we are confronted immediately by the muddiness of the waters. Which pachyderm is in the lead? Is it money or is it population, or to hear the feckless sell it, is it the destruction of our habitat via man made 'climate change'?

    Do we have a 'trifecta' with all three charging down the home stretch, neck and neck?

    ReplyDelete
  2. In a departure from the usual I thought rather than cutting one of the elephants from the pack and parading it around for your consideration that we should look at the lead group and, er, examine what their existence portends considering none of you has the stomach to debate such ponderables.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That said we are confronted immediately by the muddiness of the waters. Which pachyderm is in the lead? Is it money or is it population, or to hear the feckless sell it, is it the destruction of our habitat via man made 'climate change'?

    Do we have a 'trifecta' with all three charging down the stretch, neck and neck?

    ReplyDelete
  4. In a departure from the usual I thought rather than cutting one of the elephants from the pack and parading it around for your consideration that we should look at the lead group and, er, examine what their existence portends considering none of you has the stomach to debate such ponderables.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm going to guess 1100 posts without a single comment isn't necessarily a record, nor would it be entirely true because I comment all the time...but commenting on you own work is akin to talking to yourself. Nothing wrong with it, it just isn't productive.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What about the 'also rans' of War and the Slaver economic system that the feckless have disguised as 'opportunity' but it is actually an IQ test of the basest kind. [How f'n STUPID are you?]

    In this, your persistent silence is damning.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In a departure from the usual I thought rather than cutting one of the elephants from the pack and parading it around for your consideration that we should look at the lead group and, er, examine what their existence portends considering none of you has the stomach to debate such ponderables.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If you are feckless you would demand the truth [as YOU see it. How unfortunate for the rest of us that your truth is that Barnum was WRONG, it IS possible to fool all of the people, at least most of the time!]

    ReplyDelete
  9. That said we are confronted immediately by the muddiness of the waters. Which pachyderm is in the lead? Is it money or is it population, or to hear the feckless sell it, is it the destruction of our habitat via man made 'climate change'?

    Do we have a 'trifecta' with all three charging down the stretch, neck and neck?

    ReplyDelete
  10. What about the 'also rans' of War and the Slaver economic system that the feckless have disguised as 'opportunity' but it is actually an IQ test of the basest kind. [How f'n STUPID are you?]

    In this, your persistent silence is damning.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Admittedly I leave little room for argument and perhaps the desert of 'we hear ya' is a tribute to you, my readers who display the good sense to not debate/defend the indefensible.

    ReplyDelete

If you can't stay on topic then don't say anything...