Greetings good citizen, the controversy surrounding the 'legitimacy' of (allegedly) 'democratic processes' is coming to a head.
Under A Simple Plan we would go from voting for legislators to voting on the law itself...but this leaves us with the same quandry surrounding the 'legitimacy' of the voting process, especially to those who feel the law is 'unjust'.
I have included a 'safeguard' to minimize what specifically can be put to the public for a vote but there still exists the potential for chicanery in ANY electoral process.
I believe this is an improvement over the existing process because our 'leaders' [who are now actually managers instead of legislators] will have their lawmaking ability removed from them.
So I point to exhibit A, the people only vote on legislation itself, [The laws they are actually expected to live under] thereby removing the 'corrupting influence' of empty campaign promises and legislation so watered down as to be ineffective.
The 'safeguard I allude to is the first law of the land, the human anti-exploitation law. All 'proposed legislation must first pass muster under the Human Anti-exploitation law...if it can't then it doesn't get put to a vote, it's that simple.
Considering 99% of what gets proposed by our current 'sock puppet' legislators CAN'T pass this simple 'sniff-test', we wouldn't find ourselves running to the polls every other day to vote on new and largely unnecessary legislation.
Which is to point out if you wanted to 'decriminalize' marijuana, it would be legal already! [With the 'prison population dropping proportionally!]
So what if we're 'attacked'? Don't our 'leaders' need to vote on those situations?
It is the 'argument' the champions of the unjust will fall back on but do we get to vote to go to war? Can't point to a SINGLE INCIDENT of the public of ANY NATION 'voting to go to war' so why would we start now?
Secondary to that is the 'necessity' of war. It accomplishes nothing and 'the public' would be better served by the assassination of the responsible parties, surgical strikes as opposed to full scale invasions that sap the strength of the nation by unnecessarily crippling a generation over nothing!
Why send an army when a single, well-placed bullet is all it takes?
Did I mention our civilization is SEVERELY MIS-MANAGED?
Really makes you wonder what are they actually thinking/acting upon?
But no, better the 'Devil you know' [nevermind the 'pomp and grandeur' of military might on the march...not that anybody 'marches' anymore.]
We need technicians, NOT Soldiers who kill because that's what they're told they must do...by people who could care less.
Is THAT who you want 'managing' your affairs, is that who you want looking after the world YOU and YOURS must live in?
Because if it's what you WANT then you're certified batshit loco!
There's nothing 'sensible' about that position...there isn't anything 'desireable' about it either...the only thing our current system has going for it is 'familiarity'...and that's never a 'good thing'.
Just imagine the paradise we would live in if the effort our mis-guided leaders put into 'exterminating enemies we never knew existed' were instead put into infrastucture upgrades and energy efficiency?
The 'usurpers' have spent TRILLIONS on the Global War on Terror...and we still don't have A FREAKING CLUE what VICTORY Looks like never mind when it will 'END'?
It won't be over as long as a single 'terroroist' still draws breathe.
Don't look now good citizen but the One Percent has just declared WAR on THE REST OF US!
If you aren't one of THEM, YOU'RE A TERRORIST! [Because everyone that isn't richer than Crosius is a THREAT!]
Never mind that you don't CARE about their zillions! The fact that you can live without them only makes YOU that much more suspect, especially when it comes to crunch time...a time when you need what they have and they need it too.
You've already 'lost' the economic battle, you can't 'outbid' them.
Voila! Instant 'terrorist'!
You are laboring under the intentional 'mis-conception' that you need to wear a turban to be considered a 'terrorist' but one needn't be a 'camel jockey' to come into direct conflict with those who have placed themselves above the rest of us.
Doesn't anybody remember Mitt Romney's speech where we all learned how the One Percent DESPISES the rest of us?
Nope, can't remember back that far? It was the speech that cost him the election [not that he was doing that well in the first place, it cost him the nomination.]
Seriously, if you believe all of this 'pent up animosity' is just going to go away then you're in for a shock.
People DO remember ol' Mitt putting HALF the nation on notice...probably not such a brilliant idea since 1% is an exaggration at best, it's more like a tenth of that.
There's GOING TO BE, er, 'turmoil' on Nov 9th, REGARDLESS!
My proposal [go on strike] is the ONLY non-violent way to resolve the situation BUT make no mistake about it, those currently in power will NOT turn over the reins without first doing everything in their considerable power to 'poison the well'.
So there WILL BE PURGES.
How unfortunate for those of us working for a better world the purges will be 'two-edged' because 'loyalty' means NOTHING to these people.
Ironically your ONLY 'tell-tale' of who is winning will be the Human Anti-Exploitation Law...if that isn't the leading peice of legislation, it's the same old exploiters trying to yank your chain...er, 'again?'
Especially if they don't start with letting YOU vote directly on the laws or too many votes go against the will of the majority...or if the laws brought up for a vote don't pass muster with the Human Anti-Exploitation Law.
Or if the retards declare 'war' on anyone or as has been their fashion of late, any 'thing'/idea!
If they declare 'war on stupidity', that's your cue to burn everything in place and shoot anything sporting a badge of any kind!
Um, understand good citizen, what has gone before WILL NOT GO ON MUCH LONGER.
The 'facade of self-rule' is broken and must be replaced. The choices [should you choose to act/choose] are 'direct democracy' where control of the law is placed beyond the reach of the 'self-interested' of totalitarianism, where our self-professed 'betters' will continue to butter their bread liberally with YOUR SWEAT and let you duke it out for what few crumbs fall to the floor.
In yet another 'IMPORTANT POINT' that always conspire to land at the bottom of the post, you need to understand that the NUMBER of uber wealthy, just like the population itself continues to grow 'exponentially' with each generation and now we have arrived at a nexus where too many are getting hit with the 'distaff freeze out' and open war among the 'dispossessed' is eminent.
THE ONLY SOLUTION for this is totalitarianism...where you'll labor for free under the boot-heel of the uber-privileged.
So the 'stakes' are higher than they appear 'on the surface'.
I don't know about the rest of you but I feel bad enough being forced to raise 'wage slaves' in a world that increasingly doesn't need them. The realization that their continued survival may hinge on their willingness to become actual slaves makes my blood boil!
We DO NOT have to sit still for this...but NONE OF US can do it alone. Worse, those who would trade their children's 'freedom' for YOUR CHILDREN'S misery don't deserve the benefits of civil society.
Again, too much to absorb on a sight you visit for your 'entertainment'. I'm not looking to tickle your funny bone, I'm looking for fighters who will help me save mankind from the self-interested among us.
Thanks for letting me inside your head,
Gegner
Make a choice while you still can! Not for my sake but YOURS!
Under A Simple Plan we would go from voting for legislators to voting on the law itself...but this leaves us with the same quandry surrounding the 'legitimacy' of the voting process, especially to those who feel the law is 'unjust'.
I have included a 'safeguard' to minimize what specifically can be put to the public for a vote but there still exists the potential for chicanery in ANY electoral process.
I believe this is an improvement over the existing process because our 'leaders' [who are now actually managers instead of legislators] will have their lawmaking ability removed from them.
So I point to exhibit A, the people only vote on legislation itself, [The laws they are actually expected to live under] thereby removing the 'corrupting influence' of empty campaign promises and legislation so watered down as to be ineffective.
The 'safeguard I allude to is the first law of the land, the human anti-exploitation law. All 'proposed legislation must first pass muster under the Human Anti-exploitation law...if it can't then it doesn't get put to a vote, it's that simple.
Considering 99% of what gets proposed by our current 'sock puppet' legislators CAN'T pass this simple 'sniff-test', we wouldn't find ourselves running to the polls every other day to vote on new and largely unnecessary legislation.
Which is to point out if you wanted to 'decriminalize' marijuana, it would be legal already! [With the 'prison population dropping proportionally!]
So what if we're 'attacked'? Don't our 'leaders' need to vote on those situations?
It is the 'argument' the champions of the unjust will fall back on but do we get to vote to go to war? Can't point to a SINGLE INCIDENT of the public of ANY NATION 'voting to go to war' so why would we start now?
Secondary to that is the 'necessity' of war. It accomplishes nothing and 'the public' would be better served by the assassination of the responsible parties, surgical strikes as opposed to full scale invasions that sap the strength of the nation by unnecessarily crippling a generation over nothing!
Why send an army when a single, well-placed bullet is all it takes?
Did I mention our civilization is SEVERELY MIS-MANAGED?
Really makes you wonder what are they actually thinking/acting upon?
But no, better the 'Devil you know' [nevermind the 'pomp and grandeur' of military might on the march...not that anybody 'marches' anymore.]
We need technicians, NOT Soldiers who kill because that's what they're told they must do...by people who could care less.
Is THAT who you want 'managing' your affairs, is that who you want looking after the world YOU and YOURS must live in?
Because if it's what you WANT then you're certified batshit loco!
There's nothing 'sensible' about that position...there isn't anything 'desireable' about it either...the only thing our current system has going for it is 'familiarity'...and that's never a 'good thing'.
Just imagine the paradise we would live in if the effort our mis-guided leaders put into 'exterminating enemies we never knew existed' were instead put into infrastucture upgrades and energy efficiency?
The 'usurpers' have spent TRILLIONS on the Global War on Terror...and we still don't have A FREAKING CLUE what VICTORY Looks like never mind when it will 'END'?
It won't be over as long as a single 'terroroist' still draws breathe.
Don't look now good citizen but the One Percent has just declared WAR on THE REST OF US!
If you aren't one of THEM, YOU'RE A TERRORIST! [Because everyone that isn't richer than Crosius is a THREAT!]
Never mind that you don't CARE about their zillions! The fact that you can live without them only makes YOU that much more suspect, especially when it comes to crunch time...a time when you need what they have and they need it too.
You've already 'lost' the economic battle, you can't 'outbid' them.
Voila! Instant 'terrorist'!
You are laboring under the intentional 'mis-conception' that you need to wear a turban to be considered a 'terrorist' but one needn't be a 'camel jockey' to come into direct conflict with those who have placed themselves above the rest of us.
Doesn't anybody remember Mitt Romney's speech where we all learned how the One Percent DESPISES the rest of us?
Nope, can't remember back that far? It was the speech that cost him the election [not that he was doing that well in the first place, it cost him the nomination.]
Seriously, if you believe all of this 'pent up animosity' is just going to go away then you're in for a shock.
People DO remember ol' Mitt putting HALF the nation on notice...probably not such a brilliant idea since 1% is an exaggration at best, it's more like a tenth of that.
There's GOING TO BE, er, 'turmoil' on Nov 9th, REGARDLESS!
My proposal [go on strike] is the ONLY non-violent way to resolve the situation BUT make no mistake about it, those currently in power will NOT turn over the reins without first doing everything in their considerable power to 'poison the well'.
So there WILL BE PURGES.
How unfortunate for those of us working for a better world the purges will be 'two-edged' because 'loyalty' means NOTHING to these people.
Ironically your ONLY 'tell-tale' of who is winning will be the Human Anti-Exploitation Law...if that isn't the leading peice of legislation, it's the same old exploiters trying to yank your chain...er, 'again?'
Especially if they don't start with letting YOU vote directly on the laws or too many votes go against the will of the majority...or if the laws brought up for a vote don't pass muster with the Human Anti-Exploitation Law.
Or if the retards declare 'war' on anyone or as has been their fashion of late, any 'thing'/idea!
If they declare 'war on stupidity', that's your cue to burn everything in place and shoot anything sporting a badge of any kind!
Um, understand good citizen, what has gone before WILL NOT GO ON MUCH LONGER.
The 'facade of self-rule' is broken and must be replaced. The choices [should you choose to act/choose] are 'direct democracy' where control of the law is placed beyond the reach of the 'self-interested' of totalitarianism, where our self-professed 'betters' will continue to butter their bread liberally with YOUR SWEAT and let you duke it out for what few crumbs fall to the floor.
In yet another 'IMPORTANT POINT' that always conspire to land at the bottom of the post, you need to understand that the NUMBER of uber wealthy, just like the population itself continues to grow 'exponentially' with each generation and now we have arrived at a nexus where too many are getting hit with the 'distaff freeze out' and open war among the 'dispossessed' is eminent.
THE ONLY SOLUTION for this is totalitarianism...where you'll labor for free under the boot-heel of the uber-privileged.
So the 'stakes' are higher than they appear 'on the surface'.
I don't know about the rest of you but I feel bad enough being forced to raise 'wage slaves' in a world that increasingly doesn't need them. The realization that their continued survival may hinge on their willingness to become actual slaves makes my blood boil!
We DO NOT have to sit still for this...but NONE OF US can do it alone. Worse, those who would trade their children's 'freedom' for YOUR CHILDREN'S misery don't deserve the benefits of civil society.
Again, too much to absorb on a sight you visit for your 'entertainment'. I'm not looking to tickle your funny bone, I'm looking for fighters who will help me save mankind from the self-interested among us.
Thanks for letting me inside your head,
Gegner
Make a choice while you still can! Not for my sake but YOURS!
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you can't stay on topic then don't say anything...