Greetings good citizen, Today's offering is an exercise in belaboring the obvious...at least to some of us.
The youngsters among you might be mystified by such an assertion but my peers [many of whom are clueless by choice] know the score just the same.
Missing from the equation is 'what do I win by fighting, er, 'city hall'?'
Many have given up the pursuit of phyrric victory while reality lurks in the background humming 'one step forward, two steps back'...
This is perhaps the most damning thing about our wildly corrupt process. You can 'win' the battle and still lose the war.
So while it may not be apparent to the young (because they have yet to experience the 'stacked deck' that passes for our justice system...right, wrong or indifferent, the judge has his way.)
Which brings us to another nagging question, why do we have 'judges'?
The official reason is because they act as 'referees', insuring procedure is followed...but more often they 'direct' the proceedings to insure a particular outcome...one that is often bought & paid for in advance, is arrived at.
Since this is a 'forecast' you already have a good indication where we're headed even before we shift to the other side of the system, the political arena.
Which is to say as we chug along towards yet another 'stolen election'...because the media keeps telling us we are 'wildly divided' in our support for candidates a majority of us wouldn't spit on the best part of.
Again, not that it matters.
Everybody Knows regardless of who they 'swear in' next January, it's going to be four more years of chasing chimera and enacting legislation nobody likes because they were told to.
That's the downside of a 'meat puppet', they don't work for you, they work for them.
So, is ANYONE surprised that the forecast is for 'more of the same'?
There's no way to change it...you may as well accept it.
Except there IS a way!
Anyone who opines that either of the two 'frontrunners' would make 'a good president' is certifiably insane.
So what SHOULD we do about it?
Can you say Boycott?
Your 'participation' in this charade justifies its continued existence.
We aren't shooting at Zero [although we should be but stupid is permanent!] The lower the number the louder the message.
Will [the few, the conceited, our overlords] call for a new election if participation falls too low or will [and here comes the 'prediction'...] they punish us...and you have to ask yourself, what would be worse, a Donald presidency or a Hillary one?
From where I'm sitting neither one is palatable.
So will they go though with it?
Depends on what happens the day after election day.
You may not realize it but you 'vote' another way. You vote every day by getting your backside perpendicular and heading to whatever your job is.
IF 'a majority of us' (it will never be 100% BUT we likely have the 80% support the original revolution enjoyed, hell, anything over 50 should do the trick) didn't clock in the day(s) after the election, you think they'd get the message? [Other countries do it, notably France]
If some 'employers' decide to terminate certain strikers or punish them by docking them vacation pay/time....the strike continues. Thus the plural.]
The conventions are right around the corner but it already looks like the candidates are 'set'...the runoff will be between the two worst people running.
That said, ALL of you should be 'preparing' for a prolonged strike [If you already have an emergency stockpile of food set aside for a 'natural disaster' you should be all right, it's those who don't that need to prepare.]
The 'alternative' is marching in the streets [and being mowed down by trigger happy cops] just don't do it. Our 'betters' already consider a majority of us 'surplus'...and the cops are too stupid to question orders.
Just relax and stay home...(don't use your time off to go shopping, whatever you do!) Have impromptu block parites so you can 'take attendance' and see who has your back!
Police should be 'gently reminded' that they have to live among us too so they should definitely think before they do something decidely foolish.
Then there's the one other card our oligarchs might play, the 'call out the guard' card.
If they do that and you are one of the unfortunate few that is obliged to heed the call, go.
Let stupid arm you and make sure you grab as much amunition as you can carry...you're going to need it if this thing goes 'hot'. After you get your gun, desert.
Bizarre to use this old phrase now but it's never been more true...United we stand!
[sidebar] The pundits are already saying...well, if you plan on 'sitting out' this election, consider the alternative.
Like there is one.
Hillary is no better than the pompous pompadour.
They're BOTH members of the 1%, neither option is acceptable...and there IS something you can do about it.
The time to get the 'bandwagon' rolling is now. You don't want to be calling for a general strike the day after the election.
People need to know ahead of time what's expected of them and that 'attendance' will be taken of those who defy the strike.
You can fool some of your neighbors but believe me, they know if you're a 'first responder' or a caregiver. Consider that when you appear to be the only one reporting for work.
If things get serious you will likely regret your decision to ignore the strike.
Don't know about you good citizen but it turns my stomach to see this nation headed for another stolen election.
We've let it go for far too long, now is the time to do something about it.
I want to wish a fond farewll to the squeamish among you, I know the call to action is our cue to split before Big Brother connects you to a 'radical' like me.
To the brave few, I salute you...better to die on your feet than live on your knees!
Thanks for letting me inside your head,
Gegner
The youngsters among you might be mystified by such an assertion but my peers [many of whom are clueless by choice] know the score just the same.
Missing from the equation is 'what do I win by fighting, er, 'city hall'?'
Many have given up the pursuit of phyrric victory while reality lurks in the background humming 'one step forward, two steps back'...
This is perhaps the most damning thing about our wildly corrupt process. You can 'win' the battle and still lose the war.
So while it may not be apparent to the young (because they have yet to experience the 'stacked deck' that passes for our justice system...right, wrong or indifferent, the judge has his way.)
Which brings us to another nagging question, why do we have 'judges'?
The official reason is because they act as 'referees', insuring procedure is followed...but more often they 'direct' the proceedings to insure a particular outcome...one that is often bought & paid for in advance, is arrived at.
Since this is a 'forecast' you already have a good indication where we're headed even before we shift to the other side of the system, the political arena.
Which is to say as we chug along towards yet another 'stolen election'...because the media keeps telling us we are 'wildly divided' in our support for candidates a majority of us wouldn't spit on the best part of.
Again, not that it matters.
Everybody Knows regardless of who they 'swear in' next January, it's going to be four more years of chasing chimera and enacting legislation nobody likes because they were told to.
That's the downside of a 'meat puppet', they don't work for you, they work for them.
So, is ANYONE surprised that the forecast is for 'more of the same'?
There's no way to change it...you may as well accept it.
Except there IS a way!
Anyone who opines that either of the two 'frontrunners' would make 'a good president' is certifiably insane.
So what SHOULD we do about it?
Can you say Boycott?
Your 'participation' in this charade justifies its continued existence.
We aren't shooting at Zero [although we should be but stupid is permanent!] The lower the number the louder the message.
Will [the few, the conceited, our overlords] call for a new election if participation falls too low or will [and here comes the 'prediction'...] they punish us...and you have to ask yourself, what would be worse, a Donald presidency or a Hillary one?
From where I'm sitting neither one is palatable.
So will they go though with it?
Depends on what happens the day after election day.
You may not realize it but you 'vote' another way. You vote every day by getting your backside perpendicular and heading to whatever your job is.
IF 'a majority of us' (it will never be 100% BUT we likely have the 80% support the original revolution enjoyed, hell, anything over 50 should do the trick) didn't clock in the day(s) after the election, you think they'd get the message? [Other countries do it, notably France]
If some 'employers' decide to terminate certain strikers or punish them by docking them vacation pay/time....the strike continues. Thus the plural.]
The conventions are right around the corner but it already looks like the candidates are 'set'...the runoff will be between the two worst people running.
That said, ALL of you should be 'preparing' for a prolonged strike [If you already have an emergency stockpile of food set aside for a 'natural disaster' you should be all right, it's those who don't that need to prepare.]
The 'alternative' is marching in the streets [and being mowed down by trigger happy cops] just don't do it. Our 'betters' already consider a majority of us 'surplus'...and the cops are too stupid to question orders.
Just relax and stay home...(don't use your time off to go shopping, whatever you do!) Have impromptu block parites so you can 'take attendance' and see who has your back!
Police should be 'gently reminded' that they have to live among us too so they should definitely think before they do something decidely foolish.
Then there's the one other card our oligarchs might play, the 'call out the guard' card.
If they do that and you are one of the unfortunate few that is obliged to heed the call, go.
Let stupid arm you and make sure you grab as much amunition as you can carry...you're going to need it if this thing goes 'hot'. After you get your gun, desert.
Bizarre to use this old phrase now but it's never been more true...United we stand!
[sidebar] The pundits are already saying...well, if you plan on 'sitting out' this election, consider the alternative.
Like there is one.
Hillary is no better than the pompous pompadour.
They're BOTH members of the 1%, neither option is acceptable...and there IS something you can do about it.
The time to get the 'bandwagon' rolling is now. You don't want to be calling for a general strike the day after the election.
People need to know ahead of time what's expected of them and that 'attendance' will be taken of those who defy the strike.
You can fool some of your neighbors but believe me, they know if you're a 'first responder' or a caregiver. Consider that when you appear to be the only one reporting for work.
If things get serious you will likely regret your decision to ignore the strike.
Don't know about you good citizen but it turns my stomach to see this nation headed for another stolen election.
We've let it go for far too long, now is the time to do something about it.
I want to wish a fond farewll to the squeamish among you, I know the call to action is our cue to split before Big Brother connects you to a 'radical' like me.
To the brave few, I salute you...better to die on your feet than live on your knees!
Thanks for letting me inside your head,
Gegner
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you can't stay on topic then don't say anything...