Greetings fellow human, it comes as no surprise that you are ignorant of the conventions that prevent us from killing one another on sight.
Naturally, your education is to blame for your ignorance, that, and the inevitable 'creep' driven by those who would use the law to exploit you.
It is here that the imprecision of speech is coupled with racist/elitist dogma which creates conflicts that nobody can resolve.
Part one of the code is touching. At no time is anyone permitted to touch anyone else WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT.
For reasons no legal moron can explain [beyond the somethings got to give argument] judges, frustrated at having to deal with morons day in and day out, have given the badge toting imbeciles immunity against this prohibition.
The crux of the problem is the job itself. Again the imprecision of speech and the multiple interpretations it yields leaves too much room for misunderstanding.
Rewind to the beginning, NOBODY can TOUCH ANYBODY without their consent.
This is news to most citizens. Add to that the practice of 'neck kneeling' has become 'accepted' in law enforcement circles.
Speculation has it that neck kneeling originated in MILITARY police circles that routinely deal with rowdy, reasonably fit youngsters who instinctively resist physical restraint.
The CODE is in your genes, alongside the instinct to protect yourself.
No legislation can override the basic instinct to preserve one's life.
The actual code that forms the basis of the convention is clear: you TOUCH me (without my permission) and I WILL fuck you up!
Does anyone know what being touched without permission is legally known as? Battery. [How many of you answered Assualt, which is the act of threatening to touch somebody without their permission?.
[STOP]
If 'the law' can't get this simple concept right, how can we expect them to handle the more complex things?
They can't.
Your basic right not to be 'touched' [actually manhandled] is absolute. It is more than just POLITE to apologize when you accidentally bump into somebody. You are literally begging that individual not to exercise their right to KILL you.
You do this instinctually because the code has existed for time out of mind and was born from the primordial fact that to be 'touched' is to be eaten...or raped.
The prohibition against unwanted touching exists at the cellular level. NOBODY is ignorant of this BUT life's exploiters don't care. The prohibition against touching blocks their desire to bend you to their will and they have already decided they will KILL YOU if you don't COMPLY.
The CODE has long been ignored by those who feel a knee on the neck is permissible to insure, not safety but COMPLIANCE which the feckless equate with SAFETY, not for the individual but for THEM.
Flaunting the prohibition against unpermitted touching is a violation of the code that prevents us from killing one another on sight...and it is the legal community that has created this situation.
That is why what passes for 'law enforcement' is under siege.
A legal system that imitates/encourages criminal behavior isn't the 'necessary evil' they pretend it is.
Preventing the individual from defending themselves is a violation of their most basic right.
NOBODY can be trusted to break the convention and walk away unmolested.
NO ONE IS ABOVE THE CODE!
This is why ASP resurrects the field of honor so uninterested parties aren't placed in harm's way.
Cops and judges' understanding of the law is not the same as everyone else's.
NOBODY EVER has permission to touch you without your consent...and that consent granted at the threat of mortal peril is still a violation of an individual's rights.
Society is built on TRUST. If you can't trust the people running things it is incumbent on you to flee and seek out the like-minded to establish a community that respects the rights of others.
When that fundamental trust is ignored you are living under the rule of criminals.
Seize the criminals or stand aside as they destroy your life for personal gain.
Flaws exist and they are only being made worse thanks to the self-serving who could care less about 'the code'.
Thanks once again for letting me inside YOUR Head.
Gegner
Naturally, your education is to blame for your ignorance, that, and the inevitable 'creep' driven by those who would use the law to exploit you.
It is here that the imprecision of speech is coupled with racist/elitist dogma which creates conflicts that nobody can resolve.
Part one of the code is touching. At no time is anyone permitted to touch anyone else WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT.
For reasons no legal moron can explain [beyond the somethings got to give argument] judges, frustrated at having to deal with morons day in and day out, have given the badge toting imbeciles immunity against this prohibition.
The crux of the problem is the job itself. Again the imprecision of speech and the multiple interpretations it yields leaves too much room for misunderstanding.
Rewind to the beginning, NOBODY can TOUCH ANYBODY without their consent.
This is news to most citizens. Add to that the practice of 'neck kneeling' has become 'accepted' in law enforcement circles.
Speculation has it that neck kneeling originated in MILITARY police circles that routinely deal with rowdy, reasonably fit youngsters who instinctively resist physical restraint.
The CODE is in your genes, alongside the instinct to protect yourself.
No legislation can override the basic instinct to preserve one's life.
The actual code that forms the basis of the convention is clear: you TOUCH me (without my permission) and I WILL fuck you up!
Does anyone know what being touched without permission is legally known as? Battery. [How many of you answered Assualt, which is the act of threatening to touch somebody without their permission?.
[STOP]
If 'the law' can't get this simple concept right, how can we expect them to handle the more complex things?
They can't.
Your basic right not to be 'touched' [actually manhandled] is absolute. It is more than just POLITE to apologize when you accidentally bump into somebody. You are literally begging that individual not to exercise their right to KILL you.
You do this instinctually because the code has existed for time out of mind and was born from the primordial fact that to be 'touched' is to be eaten...or raped.
The prohibition against unwanted touching exists at the cellular level. NOBODY is ignorant of this BUT life's exploiters don't care. The prohibition against touching blocks their desire to bend you to their will and they have already decided they will KILL YOU if you don't COMPLY.
The CODE has long been ignored by those who feel a knee on the neck is permissible to insure, not safety but COMPLIANCE which the feckless equate with SAFETY, not for the individual but for THEM.
Flaunting the prohibition against unpermitted touching is a violation of the code that prevents us from killing one another on sight...and it is the legal community that has created this situation.
That is why what passes for 'law enforcement' is under siege.
A legal system that imitates/encourages criminal behavior isn't the 'necessary evil' they pretend it is.
Preventing the individual from defending themselves is a violation of their most basic right.
NOBODY can be trusted to break the convention and walk away unmolested.
NO ONE IS ABOVE THE CODE!
This is why ASP resurrects the field of honor so uninterested parties aren't placed in harm's way.
Cops and judges' understanding of the law is not the same as everyone else's.
NOBODY EVER has permission to touch you without your consent...and that consent granted at the threat of mortal peril is still a violation of an individual's rights.
Society is built on TRUST. If you can't trust the people running things it is incumbent on you to flee and seek out the like-minded to establish a community that respects the rights of others.
When that fundamental trust is ignored you are living under the rule of criminals.
Seize the criminals or stand aside as they destroy your life for personal gain.
Flaws exist and they are only being made worse thanks to the self-serving who could care less about 'the code'.
Thanks once again for letting me inside YOUR Head.
Gegner
No legislation can override the basic instinct to preserve one's life.
ReplyDeleteYou do this instinctually because the code has existed for time out of mind and was born from the primordial fact that to be 'touched' is to be eaten...or raped.
ReplyDeleteIf 'the law' can't get this simple concept right, how can we expect them to handle the more complex things?
ReplyDeleteThey can't.
Does anyone know what being touched without permission is legally known as? Battery. [How many of you answered Assault, which is the act of threatening to touch somebody without their permission you were off a tiny bit.
ReplyDeleteIf this weren't a big deal, why are there two separate statutes regarding this often dismissed 'misdemeanor?'
because it IS a big deal! Your 'space' is critical to your safety.
it comes as no surprise that you are ignorant of the conventions that prevent us from killing one another on sight.
ReplyDeleteNaturally, your education is to blame for your ignorance, that, and the inevitable 'creep' driven by those who would use the law to exploit you.
It is here that the imprecision of speech is coupled with racist/elitist dogma which creates conflicts that nobody can resolve.
The crux of the problem is the job itself. Again the imprecision of speech and the multiple interpretations it yields leaves too much room for misunderstanding.
ReplyDeleteRewind to the beginning, NOBODY can TOUCH ANYBODY without their consent.